Those were Miller's remarks. Keep me out of it except for a tilt into parody, or truly evil wit. wc
________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:55:47 AM Subject: Re: Marks In a message dated 6/29/09 10:48:12 AM, [email protected] writes: > most > marks cannot be distinguished from their backgrounds -- and in some > paintings, > none of them can) > > > Without their surrounding visual context, marks are as unimportant as the > disconnected fragments of text that Michael has cut from a page. > Would you describe for us the notion you have in mind when you use the word 'mark'? I mean what I'll call the "definition" notion -- the characteristics that, to your mind, justify calling something a 'mark'? ************** It's raining cats and dogs -- Come to PawNation, a place where pets rule! (http://www.pawnation.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000008)
