If Steinberg's lesson (about looking for an internal order) is not particularly relevant to the art you are used to seeing (19th and 20th Century), I'm very curious just which 19th C. artists are included in that bunch.
Do the paintings of Manet, for example, lack an internal order that is worth considering? >Actually a lecture by Leo Steinberg changed the way I look at Rubens - Steinberg made it apparent that given that in actuality when I looked at a Rubens - for instance the Medici cycle I was not actually viewing them in that the painting's each had an internal order and them and that my habits informed by looking 19th and 20th century art was leaving me with only half an experience (Saul Ostrow) ____________________________________________________________ Click now to get the general liability insurance you need to protect yourself! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxcCKiVrP8wmEjOd9FJRaCQeS NX5vh8P6XabPadAHzUFdQQTOum5eo/
