>I think the difficulty   may be that the definition of"as well as it can be
done" can change between cultures. The function of a formal portrait of the
Renaissance was not the same as the oft cited high school yearbook
portrait, a difference I am sure we are all aware   of. (kate)


"As well as it can be done" cannot be defined.

Which is why such a concern is so vulnerable and problematic in an academic
environment -- and why Berger can so off-offhandedly ignore it, as he proceeds
to exemplify his discussion of Rembrandt by using a painting which the RRP
(Rembrandt Research Project) has declared "not up to speed".

Go to the RRP website and read the essay about "Connoisseurship and
Rembrandt's paintings by its current director, Ernst Van de Wetering.


"The essence of traditional connoisseurship is the ability based on
experience, to recognize the hand of a painter"

"Connoisseurship is thus not an exclusively art  historical method but is
rather an attribute that can be seen as part of our natural cognitive
repertory"


 EVDW  traces the conflicts between connoisseurship and technical scholarship
throughout the 40 year history of the RRP, noting that over the first few
decades, the pendulum swung towards the former, but more recently has turned
towards the latter.  But both have always been necessary.

And you can also  note that "recognizing the hand of the painter" is not the
same thing as handwriting analysis - because it necessarily includes the
judgment of quality.

So, for example, to prove that the Copenhagen version of the Gotenburg "Knight
with a Falcon" is also by Rembrandt,  EVDW  notes that  "the way in which the
forehead, eye sockets and the mouth are rendered in subtle foreshortening is
far  more complex --- it is surely wrong to assume that a mediocre copyist
would want to introduce all these complicated changnes and would further be
capable of executing them with no more than twenty or thirty amazingly telling
brushstrokes"

What distinguishes an "amazingly telling brushstroke" from those which are
ordinary? or subtle from not subtle ? or mediocre copyist from gifted copyist
?

It's the same ability that distinguishes "as well as it can be done" from
everything that falls short.

And the best word for that ability is "taste" -- despite its utter
disparagement and dismissal as mere subjective opinion in both Berger's
academia  as well in in the world of commercial marketing.


____________________________________________________________
Small Business Tools
Compete with the big boys.  Click here to find products to benefit your
business.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/c?cp=4exJRuUm94paCQoPfScpeAAAJz6c
l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARMQAAAAA=

Reply via email to