Nothing is learned about the world by looking at self - and that's the direction that Berger recursively pursues as he joins Lacanian psychoanalysis in pondering transhistorical psychology and practices "close reading", which is really just an endless exploration of what words can mean as far as he is concerned.
He's a babbler -- just like those poor fellows one occasionally finds riding on public transportation. When he babbles about art historians, it can serve as an introduction to discussing some of their ideas. But, as you might recall, Cheerskep once asked "Eventually I hope you'll tell us of any valuable insight Berger offers to the "pose" that wouldn't have come to you on your own with three minutes of reflection." The fact that you still can't answer should sufficiently articulate the "difficulty that you can perceive" And then, you might reconsider whether you should judge him "both subtle and a master of his method" >Berger is both subtle and a master of his method,it is some other difficulty that I can perceive but not articulate. Perhaps Miller would like to delve into whatever that might be.KAte Sullivan ____________________________________________________________ Love Spell Click here to light up your life with a love spell! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/c?cp=doQQ6OWDVG5QHygcDPzqtAAAJz6c l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARwAAAAA=
