In a message dated 3/12/10 12:12:14 PM, [email protected] writes:

>  By evoking painting practices that deskill my painting practice, I
> symbolize the fragility of my imagery despite the assertiveness of my brush
and
> paint practice. I am saying that all artists, all art practice, is in the
> same position today.  No practice is free from a contradicting practice --
> from a deskilling alternative -- that has also been affirmed as art by the
> same processes or institutions or authority that have always affirmed art. 
>
>

   You are quite right in saying that   marks made by non brushes are now
acclaimed as art marks. You do seem to imply that it devalues brush marks, or
skilled marks.   Marks made by   non brushes have always been
present-Claude applied his paint with his hands.Chardin would not admit how he
applied
his paint,the other end of the brush   has often been used. The
contradicting painting practices   of the present often evoke the more bravura
effects
of the past-the whir of the dry brush, the piles of paint dissolving into
lace.
They do it often enough so it seems deliberate. How do you explain this?
KAte Sullivan

Reply via email to