Is wrong a reified abstraction ? Or merely a category? On 6/1/10 2:23 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
This is a premature and incomplete heads up about Harris's position. Like every academic I know of in linguistics and philosophy of language, he appears to be reifying abstractions like "categories", "art", "religions". I know -- everybody does it. But everybody is wrong.abstration On Jun 1, 2010, at 1:28:07 PM, [email protected] wrote: From: [email protected] Subject: Re: book Date: June 1, 2010 1:28:07 PM EDT To: [email protected], [email protected] In a message dated 6/1/10 9:48:30 AM, [email protected] writes: > Roy Harris: The Great Debate About Art, Prickly Paradigm Press, 2010. > 10,95 on Amazon. It sounds good. Harris is a Professor Emeritus from Oxford and does something called integrationist linguistics. Kate Sullivan --
