There is nothing like getting paid for something one does for the pleasure of doing ab
________________________________ From: leo sullivan <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:45 PM Subject: Re: "Art collectors are good because they help the painters, but they are bad insofar as they give too much importance to those arts that can be bought and sold." I agree with William. They should pay promptly. And tell their friends. Kate Sullivan Sent from my iPod On Jan 10, 2012, at 6:06 PM, William Conger <[email protected]> wrote: > A good collector is one who pays promptly and tells rich friends to do the same. > But the quioted statement is plenty dumb. Should collectors avoid art that is > only bought and sold? > wc > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: joseph berg <[email protected]> > To: aesthetics-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, January 10, 2012 3:11:14 PM > Subject: "Art collectors are good because they help the painters, but they are > bad insofar as they give too much importance to those arts that can be bought > and sold." > > "Art collectors are good because they help the painters, but they are bad > insofar as they give too much importance to those arts that can be bought > and sold." > > http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Culture/Art/2011/Dec-23/157684-an-education-in-fu nding-arab-arts.ashx#axzz1j5lET0gu
