On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:00 PM, joseph berg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, William Conger <[email protected]>wrote: > >> These are property disputes, money disputes, not art disputes. Judges >> routinely >> decide on property and money issues. Another non-issue presented as >> sensational. >> Ho-hum. >> wc >> > > But if insiders can't reach a consensus as to how to define what they do, > than won't that be perceived by outsiders as an invitation to come up with > some kind of definition of their own? > > I would think that insiders would want to avoid that at all costs. > - A doctrine serves no purpose in itself, but it is indispensable to have one if only to avoid being deceived by false doctrines. Simone Weil
