In a message dated 10/13/12 3:23:13 PM, [email protected] writes:
> Are you sure you read this carefully enough,before shooting it down as > not expressed with sufficient clarity for discussion? > Yes, say I, I'm sure. I gave only Exhibit One. But I could easily fill two pages detailing lots of additional evidence for feeling Schneider is not equipped to clearly discuss the numerous terms he uses. I plead regretfully guilty to seeming abrupt and dismissive, but the repelling truth is, I've learned how bootless it is to try to convey to someone unequipped that he is unequipped. (I'll preemptively try to fend off an obvious reponse by saying I'm aware of dozens of other topics in which I myself would be woefully unequipped.) > It is always > possible to improve on any phrasing but sometimes the problem,clumsily > stated as it may be, is more interesting than straightening out the > prose.
