Thanks to the GI Bill for all WW2 Veterans, I had my Art Education in the
40's.
And since, held well paid jobs as an Animator and later as a Toy sculptor and
designer for all the Major doll companies and all the while did my Fine Art
sculpture
to this day,today.
ab
On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:55 PM, William Conger wrote:

> Back in the 50s and 60s only about 10% of the population went to college.
For
> the most part they studied whatever interested them and plenty of them chose
the
> humanities.  Most of the graduates who entered the work force after college
> were, of course, men. Women had few options other than nurse, teacher, or
> secretary.  It didn't matter if graduates had majored in English, History,
or
> even art, the bigger employers ran their own training programs which
introduced
> the best new employees to their business cultures and practices and they
> preferred 'well-rounded' young men who could write a decent letter, speak
> properly, hold their own in lively conversation, dress well enough and
exhibit
> good manners.  This doesn't mean that the majority of kids had good grammar
> school and high school educations.  They didn't.  Most were quite illiterate
and
> aimed for a good factory job at best, or looked to the required military
service
> for technical training.  Only the best prepared -- and most representative
of a
> white-collar middle class -- went to  college and thus were all but
preselected
> for American business regardless of their academic specialties.   Being
without
> family I had to work right away after college.  I was hired as a copywriter
even
> though I had majored in art.  Then after a few years I became a corporate
> advertising manager and was on a fast track for a job with bespoke suits,
fancy
> cars, model girlfriends, and plenty of cash.   Nobody ever asked me if I had
> studied advertising in school or had any training in writing ads, etc.  If
I
> had not quit business and gone to grad school and then to teaching art, I
> probably would've had a successful career as an advertising or corporate
> executive.
>
> Nowadays it's much different.  English majors and History majors can't get
entry
> jobs in business.  Art grads are fashionable  -- somewhat -- because the
buzz is
> that they know how to think creatively.  (Very dubious).  More than 30% of
young
> people now finish college (and 20% of those are still illiterate and narrow,
I
> think).  Business no longer run their own training programs (thanks to the
> community college).  They want new employees to know what to do the first
day.
> wc
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Michael Brady <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sat, February 9, 2013 10:47:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Skills children learn from the arts
>
> On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:14 AM, saulostrow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> very english Public School  and ivy thinking  - not very American public
>> school were literacy was the goal
>
> "... where literacy was the goal."
>
>
> and later
>
>> Actually, what seems to have done this was the destruction of the middle
>> classes  who once thought education was not only a way to get ahead but to
>> improve one's self - sometime in the 70s when the middle classes because
>> they  were the only one with economic reserves became economically
>> vulnerable  as such  improving oneself came to  mean  preserving oneself
>> economically  - the irony is that  today, education does not guarantee one
>> will do better than their parents
>
> So it comes down to a Marxist view of history in terms of economic
struggles?
>
> Or do you mean the 70s, when the 60s radicals began to get faculty
positions
> in high schools and colleges and to promote the notion that "right" and
> "wrong" answers are social constructs that only serve to sustain the
hegemony
> of privilege? That preferences of grammatical forms and logical arguments
are
> social discriminators that promote the racist subtext of society? That
effort
> and intent are equivalent to results? That rote work in school is
conditioning
> the drones for the assembly line?
>
>
>
> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> Michael Brady

Reply via email to