Ahhhh. Config restore is a deal killer. Guess I’ll order another batch of Gen1 
this week then. I was trying to figure out which. 

> On Jul 3, 2018, at 20:08, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, they're usable... the most annoying thing for me is that they're 
> missing a way to restore a saved config, so everything has to be configured 
> manually... and there's some stuff that you have to configure, if you want to 
> be able to access them later.
> 
> But I heard that they're shipping with a newer firmware now that has some 
> stuff fixed. And at least the signal level updates more than once every 5 
> minutes, so it's actually possible to align the things properly in less than 
> an hour, unlike the Gen 1(I think it was actually more like 30 seconds 
> between updates, but still...).
> 
> That's just the UEs though... I haven't seen any problems with the Gen2 
> eNBs... I think they actually use the same firmware as the Gen1, but they're 
> a much nicer design and they're supposed use a lot less power. 
> 
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 5:22 PM Matt Hoppes <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Is the gen2 stuff usable?  I need to buy more CPEs but only if they are 
>> functional. What’s missing?
>> 
>>> On Jul 3, 2018, at 18:14, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yep, it'll probably get there eventually, but at this point, the software 
>>> is a bit crude. The Gen2 hardware is certainly a big improvement over the 
>>> earlier stuff though (aside from the software side of things).
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Ryan Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> LTE is LTE. However their software, hardware leaves a lot to be desired. 
>>>> Even simple translations back to english can use a lot of work. 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> They have their issues like everyone else, but they are really open about 
>>>>> them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have a good number of customers using them successfully.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jeff Broadwick
>>>>> CTIconnect
>>>>> 312-205-2519 Office
>>>>> 574-220-7826 Cell
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 3, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Dustin Jurman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Wish Patrick was still around,  lots of good people work for them but 
>>>>>> equipment doesn’t work as stated on this list before and by experience 
>>>>>> so charging for something that is still beta is BS.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> YMMV
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 6:10 PM
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] baicells
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My understanding had always been $1/month/user.
>>>>>> I had never heard anything else.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 7/2/2018 5:55 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Uhhhh. Then why are they charging?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 17:39, Trey Scarborough <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> They were going to charge for their cloud based EPC, but in the end I do 
>>>>>> believe they said they would keep it free.  This doesn't mean that they 
>>>>>> always will...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 7/2/2018 4:19 PM, Dustin Jurman wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anyone get the email that they are starting to charge monthly for every 
>>>>>> sub?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 12:21 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> OK, with at least one vendor offering a special deal on these radios, 
>>>>>> calling it a “Patriot Pack”.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am wondering how that makes one patriotic.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Maybe they are applying them a US flag sticker that says “shipped to the 
>>>>>> USA”....
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (Just being my usual smart assed self, my apologies to whoever came up 
>>>>>> with the sale idea... I am just being silly here)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> F
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> rom: Gino A. Villarini
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 10:10 AM
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] baicells
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> China
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Chuck McCown 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gino A. Villarini
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> President
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 12:08 PM
>>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] baicells
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Where is baicells HQ located?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to