Shireen cable is DC-2022 we used..

Jaime Solorza

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 9:42 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> My guess is that it is likely easier to do the right thing with the
> liquidtight conduit.
>
> In a high rf environment one of the best things you can do is to create a
> faraday cage consisting of the metal enclosure, the shield around the cat5
> cable and the radio shielding/metal enclosure.  If the shield is
> continuous, then the rf signal won't be able to enter the twisted pairs
> themselves.
>
> In a shielded cat5 environment, you have to take care that the shield
> itself is terminated at the entry of the metal enclosure.  This is either
> accomplished though stripping the shield back and connecting it directly to
> a metal clamp of some sort at the entry point, or some sort of grounded
> shieled waterproof feedthrough coupler.
>
> If you use a metal conduit all the way from the box to the radio, this
> faraday cage will largely be automatically generated, especially if the
> radio is in a metal enclosure such as a 450i.   Even if the radio isn't in
> a metal enclosure, as long as the gap is very small, you'll end up with
> much of the same benefits.
>
> If you are using a metal enclosure for your electronics, one of the worst
> things you can do is to bring the shields inside the metal enclosure
> without grounding them at the entry point.   The shields can become little
> reradiating antennas inside the enclosure if you don't ground them at the
> entry point.
>
> My preference at high rf sites is to ground the shield at a metal
> enclosure, and use unshielded cable inside the enclosure.   Adding a
> ferrite bead just inside the enclosure can help to filter out any remaining
> rf.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 7:35 PM Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious why Liquidtight works when the foil shield on the Cat5
>> doesn't.  Extra distance from the twists?  Heavier gauge steel?  Do you
>> need to make sure the liquid tight is grounded, or just the fact that it's
>> around the cat5 is enough?
>>
>> On 7/20/2018 7:04 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that too.  Some folks could not make it work without the
>> liquidtight.
>>
>> *From:* Sean Heskett
>> *Sent:* Friday, July 20, 2018 5:38 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ethernet problems next to FM Antenna
>>
>> Put all Ethernet cables inside shielded liquidtight flex conduit.  You
>> can buy it st an electrical supply shop.
>>
>> Be sure to run the conduit to a metal box at the top and then breakout to
>> each ap in smaller shielded conduit.
>>
>> -sean
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:35 AM Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like the old archives aren't back online yet, so I couldn't go
>>> searching through there for ideas.
>>>
>>> I have a site where we have been co-locating with a 800w FM Transmitter
>>> for years.  We've always had Ethernet problems at the site since the FM
>>> went in.  Everything is shielded cat5 (Belden 7919).  It is at a grain
>>> elevator, our equipment is on one corner of the platform, and the FM
>>> Transmitter is on the other corner.  We are horizontally separated by
>>> about 10 feet.  There is no way to get vertical separation.  I used to
>>> run all the cables down to the bottom of the leg, about 100'.  In an
>>> effort to make the Ethernet work better, I installed an Edgepoint fed
>>> with Fiber at the top, so cable lengths between the radios and the
>>> Edgepoint are now 5'-10'. With the FM Transmitter turned off, everything
>>> runs perfectly.  When the FM is turned on, most equipment drops to
>>> 100mb, and some goes down to 10mb.  On the most problematic equipment, I
>>> have installed the 4 pair FM Filters from Sandman
>>> http://www.sandman.com/rf.html within 12" of both the switch and the
>>> radio.  It made no change.
>>>
>>> What FM Elimination tricks have I forgotten to try?  I was really
>>> expecting the short cable lengths to solve the problem.
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to