Glad you're interested - As this is a public list - partner/operator prices are generally available offline. Happy to supply Mike some for his spreadsheet.
Bandwidths: For FOR3: please see this chart which includes ANSI channel sizes - *XPIC*: we have another product - CableFree Diamond - that has XPIC and 2048QAM as standard. *CableFree Diamond* Full Outdoor Microwave Radio supporting XPIC and 2048QAM modulation, advanced ACM and other features up to 2Gbps Capacity. Up to 2Gbps full duplex with up to 112MHz channel widths supported. 48V DC powered with options for ac 110-250V supply. Can scale to 4Gbps or more with 2+0 configuration. Available in many bands including 17, 18, 24, 26GHz (Future support for more bands) www.cablefree.net/diamond On 23 July 2018 at 17:00, <[email protected]> wrote: > Price? > Do you have XPIC versions? > What BW do they do with realistic (USA FCC licensed) channel sizes? > > *From:* Stephen Patrick > *Sent:* Monday, July 23, 2018 9:48 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 11 or 18 > > Interesting discussion. > Here's what you can get with non-XPIC in 112MHz, 1024QAM: > > This example below is for 13GHz & 15GHz radio, and the 11 & 18GHz can do > just the same capacity. > > CableFree FOR3 Microwave : 15GHz Test Results: 881.2Mbps FDX > https://youtu.be/bwc9ou3PO9I > > CableFree FOR3 Microwave : 13GHz Test Results: 881.2Mbps FDX > https://youtu.be/eKFhLoqspyE > > These radios do have ANSI modes and can fill up the full 80MHz channel for > example. > > And if you use an XPIC radio, you can double these capacities. > > Best regards > > Stephen > > > > On 19 July 2018 at 02:40, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, but on the bright side, the fact that it occupies that much >> spectrum means that there shouldn't be any trouble upgrading to real 80mhz >> radios later on... >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Tim Hardy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yeah and sadly that “56 MHz” AF11 occupies 79.6 MHz of spectrum - all >>> other ETSI radios occupied 56. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:09 PM Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Both are 80 MHz, but the AF11 only uses 56 MHz wide... If you look at >>>> the channel mask from a spectrum analyzer of an expensive carrier type 11 >>>> GHz radio (Dragonwave, Ceragon) it uses nearly all of the 80. >>>> >>>> 18 GHz, 112MHz x dual pol products exist for the ETSI and international >>>> market. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Of course I want to use an AF11X due to the price, but which band has >>>>> the wider channels? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> > > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
