I just saw this on slashdot: https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/poe-hat/


On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, that makes more sense.
>
> My initial assumption was that you were doing some automated management at
> the site, i.e. rebooting radios, etc via script control.   I'm trying to
> figure out what is interesting for people to control automatically so I can
> make sure those features make it into either the first or an early release.
>
> For what you're doing, I'd definitely start with the Pi.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 7:20 PM, David Coudron <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That’s right.   We have this running in our NOC as a backup only if the
>> local ones fail.  Our DIAs are geographically dispersed so the thought is
>> we run these in the DIA and some other key towers for their local subnets
>> only since we don’t backhaul our traffic from the different regions to the
>> NOC, we dump it on the Internet close to the tower groupings.   If these
>> monitors fail for some reason, we fire up the one in the NOC that is
>> connected to those subnets through VPN.   We are looking for cheap and
>> small foot print since we have a very feasible backup we can kick in
>> easily.
>>
>>
>>
>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* 30141712500n behalf of
>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2018 6:55 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] POE powered PC for monitoring
>>
>>
>>
>> Probably what a lot of us would do. I kind of get the impression that he
>> wants to run these things locally?
>>
>>
>>
>> bp
>>
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/25/2018 3:39 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>>
>> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it typical to run those
>> functions in one or more servers in your noc?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018, 3:05 PM David Coudron <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> OK, sounds like we need to get our hands on a PI and start messing with
>> it.   Our monitoring is mostly going to be IP based stuff.   We are
>> implementing Sonar and need it to run the Poller client.  So we will be
>> ping devices and doing SNMP pulls.   We may also have it do some other
>> scripted stuff, but haven’t really dug into that much.
>>
>>
>>
>> Once we have a Linux device in these sites, I am sure there is more that
>> we could be doing with it than what we monitor/control today.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> David Coudron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian
>> (List Account)
>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2018 3:04 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] POE powered PC for monitoring
>>
>>
>>
>> Raspberry pi should be robust enough, the only issue would be sd card
>> durability if you don't pick a good quality card and take care to mount the
>> drives with sd friendly mount options.
>>
>>
>>
>> To somewhat hijack the discussion, I'm interested in what you plan to
>> monitor on site.  The reason is that I'm currently doing product definition
>> work for our next generation in caninet monitoring platform which is going
>> to include a lot of the functionality that would normally be reserved for
>> the noc.   Mainly want to know what people are looking for in this type of
>> solution.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018, 8:10 AM David Coudron <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> We are considering adding a small Linux based PC/device into our cabinets
>> to run a variety of monitoring services.   There are lots of small
>> computing options out there, but we haven’t stumbled across a solution that
>> seems to provide the fit we are looking for.   Here is a list of desired
>> features:
>>
>>    1. Support for Ubuntu 16.04
>>    2. POE powered, either 24 or 48 V will work
>>    3. Small form factor, DIN Rail mounted would be ideal
>>    4. Cheap – We think there is reasonably priced stuff out there, but
>>    haven’t found it yet.   There are industrial versions of these things, but
>>    we don’t need that reliability or durability
>>
>>
>>
>> Some things that aren’t important to us:
>>
>>    1. Durability – we have backup monitoring running in our NOC so if we
>>    lose one of these we can run indefinitely without it
>>    2. High Performance – any moderate level platform will do, it is just
>>    monitoring
>>    3. Gigabit Ethernet – 100 Mbit is fine
>>    4. Bluetooth/Wifi or video support -  As long as we can get Linux
>>    installed and log into it remotely we are fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> We keep looking at the Raspberry PI platform, but are not sure that
>> either the performance/compatibility under Ubuntu will be OK.   Anyone have
>> any luck with a moderately priced solution for this kind of thing?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> David Coudron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to