Yeah, but the point is the environment is polluted with these - making it harder to put new paths in.
> On Oct 10, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/10/18 5:20 AM, Tim Hardy wrote: >> 160 MHz Bw not legal in the US and would require rule waivers if the channel >> pairs were available. Bear in-mind that the Jirous antennas used on a lot >> of UBNT and Mimosa paths are only Cat B and don’t lend themselves to a lot >> of frequency reuse. Even the Cat A antennas (3’ - Commscope, RadioWaves, >> RFS) aren’t that great (Commscope’s Sentinel and RFS’ SC are better). >> There’s a reason why many of the Cellular and Public Safety systems use 4 or >> 6 foot shrouded high performance or ultra-high performance antennas.. > > > Anyone using a UBNT or Mimosa probably don't want to pay for (or can't > afford) a Class 4 Sentinel. > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
