i.e. what was a once is a while dropout of the Sat radio service is
becoming totally location definable because of terrestrial interference
... I am not sure this is what is happening, but it sure seems like it.
On 12/17/2018 01:24 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Doesn’t take much stray signal to interfere with a ground station. You
have ground stations all over the place that may be aimed at a satellite
and any local activity from terrestrial transmitter in the area can kill
them.
I remember the back end of this whole thing, when C band were just
getting going and AT&T had a bunch of terrestrial microwave links on the
same band. People thought that a point to point aimed totally away from
the earth station would not be a problem. It was a problem. Big
problem. All the ground based systems had to shut down to allow
everyone to get showtime and HBO.
*From:* Sean Heskett
*Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2018 2:03 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] C-Band Alliance letter
Yeah but as it stands each licensee has 500mhz (full band) full arch of
the sky protection, even if they are only using a small portion of the
band and in one direction. It’s a big waste of spectrum that can be now
be shared with the new SAS type database coordination to protect current
users but still allow mobile and fixed wireless to opertunistically use
what isn’t being used.
-Sean
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:49 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
But if you owned a C band satellite and had been making money for
years off of it, I can see where you would want some protection.
*From:* Mark Radabaugh
*Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2018 10:50 AM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] C-Band Alliance letter
Well - the C-Band alliance is a front for the satellite industry and
the spectrum they are discussing is potentially being reallocated
for fixed wireless use. The satellite industry would like to be
paid top dollar for the spectrum they received for free years ago
versus the FCC just deciding they want it back and making it
available on a Part-101 type basis.
WISPA’s proposal to the FCC is shared use at much lower cost.
Are they the enemy? Well - they certainly didn’t come to WISPA
asking to make a deal with the members and are making an active end
run around. C-Band Alliance has also opposed pretty much
everything WISPA and WISPs have done in the past.
Mark
On Dec 17, 2018, at 12:21 PM, Steve Jones
<[email protected]> wrote:
Are they our enemy?
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:12 AM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]>
wrote:
Sent to the WISPA lists, but I know a lot of you don’t watch
those lists so reposting here...
A letter is being mailed to nearly all WISP’s in the country
by the “C-Band Alliance” regarding 3.7-4.2 Ghz spectrum.
/*Please do not take any action on this until you hear more
from WISPA. */
/*
*/
Further information will be coming shortly.
Mark
Mark Radabaugh
WISPA FCC Committee Chair
[email protected]
419-261-5996 <tel:419-261-5996>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
