Sat in US is S-band, should be no terrestrial interference there.

Sent from my iPad

> On Dec 17, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Robert Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> i.e. what was a once is a while dropout of the Sat radio service is becoming 
> totally location definable because of terrestrial interference ...   I am not 
> sure this is what is happening, but it sure seems like it.
> 
>> On 12/17/2018 01:24 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Doesn’t take much stray signal to interfere with a ground station. You have 
>> ground stations all over the place that may be aimed at a satellite and any 
>> local activity from terrestrial transmitter in the area can kill them.
>> I remember the back end of this whole thing, when C band were just getting 
>> going and AT&T had a bunch of terrestrial microwave links on the same band.  
>> People thought that a point to point aimed totally away from the earth 
>> station would not be a problem.  It was a problem.  Big problem.  All the 
>> ground based systems had to shut down to allow everyone to get showtime and 
>> HBO.
>> *From:* Sean Heskett
>> *Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2018 2:03 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] C-Band Alliance letter
>> Yeah but as it stands each licensee has 500mhz (full band) full arch of the 
>> sky protection, even if they are only using a small portion of the band and 
>> in one direction.  It’s a big waste of spectrum that can be now be shared 
>> with the new SAS type database coordination to protect current users but 
>> still allow mobile and fixed wireless to opertunistically use what isn’t 
>> being used.
>> -Sean
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:49 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>    But if you owned a C band satellite and had been making money for
>>    years off of it, I can see where you would want some protection.
>>    *From:* Mark Radabaugh
>>    *Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2018 10:50 AM
>>    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] C-Band Alliance letter
>>    Well - the C-Band alliance is a front for the satellite industry and
>>    the spectrum they are discussing is potentially being reallocated
>>    for fixed wireless use.   The satellite industry would like to be
>>    paid top dollar for the spectrum they received for free years ago
>>    versus the FCC just deciding they want it back and making it
>>    available on a Part-101 type basis.
>>    WISPA’s proposal to the FCC is shared use at much lower cost.
>>    Are they the enemy?   Well - they certainly didn’t come to WISPA
>>    asking to make a deal with the members and are making an active end
>>    run around.   C-Band Alliance has also opposed pretty much
>>    everything WISPA and WISPs have done in the past.
>>    Mark
>>>    On Dec 17, 2018, at 12:21 PM, Steve Jones
>>>    <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>    Are they our enemy?
>>>    On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:12 AM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]>
>>>    wrote:
>>> 
>>>        Sent to the WISPA lists, but I know a lot of you don’t watch
>>>        those lists so reposting here...
>>>        A letter is being mailed to nearly all WISP’s in the country
>>>        by the “C-Band Alliance” regarding 3.7-4.2 Ghz spectrum.
>>>        /*Please do not take any action on this until you hear more
>>>        from WISPA. */
>>>        /*
>>>        */
>>>        Further information will be coming shortly.
>>>        Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>>        Mark Radabaugh
>>>        WISPA FCC Committee Chair
>>>        [email protected]
>>>        419-261-5996 <tel:419-261-5996>
>>>        --         AF mailing list
>>>        [email protected]
>>>        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> 
>>>    --     AF mailing list
>>>    [email protected]
>>>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    --     AF mailing list
>>    [email protected]
>>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>    --     AF mailing list
>>    [email protected]
>>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to