lol. Ok. So I’m not alone on this. 

> On Dec 27, 2018, at 10:04, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yes the quality is shit. BUT, the people that pay for it love it because it's 
> available everywhere and has so many channels. Unfortunately, I can barely 
> listen to it with how compressed it is. I stream spotify over bluetooth in my 
> car and it's way better quality. I think FM sounds better than XM by a long 
> shot.
> 
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 8:13 AM Adair Winter <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> because no commercials and the same stations everywhere it pretty cool.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 8:00 AM Matt Hoppes 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> We just got a new vehicle at work that includes XM radio for some period of 
>>> time for free. 
>>> 
>>> Anyone else who’s had experience with XM: does it always sound like it’s 
>>> compressed, digital and low fidelity?  Why would anyone pay a subscription 
>>> for this when I get high-fidelity FM free?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Adair Winter
>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
>> C: 806.231.7180
>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> www.mnwifi.com
> 507-634-WiFi
>  Like us on Facebook
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to