I think that article also said something about upstream is still 4G? Wow, that would be very asymmetric. I’m guessing that’s not true long term?
From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Real 5G review I guess if everybody outdoor with LOS is on the 5G microcell then they've offloaded capacity to get more performance out of the 4G. I think a lot of us have a LOS 5.8ghz system alongside an LTE or Wimax system (or 900mhz God help you). Even if only 20% of your WISP customers have LOS, that frees up that much capacity on your NLOS system. I'm thinking 5G isn't that different of a scenario. Not a replacement for 4G, but a supplement to ease congestion. Very expensive supplement though. On 5/17/2019 11:16 AM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: So, exactly as we all predicted. Short LOS if you hold your phone and head and body just right. Gimmick. From: Carl Peterson Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 8:26 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: [AFMUG] Real 5G review First Honest assessment of an actual 5G network I've seen that isn't marketing or sour grapes. https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/16/18628080/verizon-5g-network-gigabit-1gbps-download-speeds _____ -- AF mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
