Yep... it's kind of the same idea. I'm guessing that 5G probably does make sense in places like NYC or Chicago, where you might have a couple million zombies wandering around on the streets staring at their phones, just because it gets a lot of that traffic off of the 4G network.
I'm really not sure that I've ever done anything on a cell phone that would make me care about the difference between 20Mbps and 1Gbps... On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:47 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess if everybody outdoor with LOS is on the 5G microcell then they've > offloaded capacity to get more performance out of the 4G. > I think a lot of us have a LOS 5.8ghz system alongside an LTE or Wimax > system (or 900mhz God help you). Even if only 20% of your WISP customers > have LOS, that frees up that much capacity on your NLOS system. I'm > thinking 5G isn't that different of a scenario. Not a replacement for 4G, > but a supplement to ease congestion. > > Very expensive supplement though. > > On 5/17/2019 11:16 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > So, exactly as we all predicted. Short LOS if you hold your phone and > head and body just right. Gimmick. > > *From:* Carl Peterson > *Sent:* Friday, May 17, 2019 8:26 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Real 5G review > > First Honest assessment of an actual 5G network I've seen that isn't > marketing or sour grapes. > > > https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/16/18628080/verizon-5g-network-gigabit-1gbps-download-speeds > > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
