You just clamp that around a ground rod and it gives you ohms, resistance
to earth?  Is it really that simple?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:01 AM Lewis Bergman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> R56 is a standard developed by Motorola for critical communications sites.
> Chuck can likely point you to a similiar standard developed by NEC or some
> Telco consortium that defines grounding standards for telco facilities.
> Half the standards are usually about human safety and the other half are
> about equipment safety.
>
> The bottom line is, if you can get your site to less than 5 Ohms earth
> resistance to ground you are about as good as you can hope for. Lower is
> better but below 5 Ohms the return on investment diminshes rapidly. I think
> the lowest I have seen is 0.5 Ohms on a brand new site. We put a lot of
> grounding, enhancemnet material, etc. But it is like good insurance and it
> does work. We had an old tower that had poor grounding. We retrofitted it
> with a modern system and lowered the number of strikes from an average of
> 15 or so a year to 1 in 3 years.
>
> You can use a device like this: Clamp on ground tester
> <http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/AEMC/ground-resistance-testers/clamp-on/clamp-on-ground-resistance-tester-6416.htm?ref=gbase&gclid=CjwKCAjwiZnnBRBQEiwAcWKfYi9_sp7BYOU7SUh8oCsy0VRd-Sm9Kx05ShpV-11tT_xAboQ4UAY5GxoClmgQAvD_BwE>
>  to
> easily measure the resistance of a whole site. You do have to know where
> and how to use it. To accurately measure parts of a grounding system
> accurately you have to know how it is designed. Most of the time a zer
> resistance reading means you are measuring a loop of copper. I laugh every
> time I go to a cell site and they have a ground test pound that is
> basically a loop on top of a ground rod. Yaeh, no wonder they passed the
> test.
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:32 PM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Google “Air Terminal Lightning” and then click on images.
>>
>> Or just check out some of these:
>>
>> https://www.erico.com/category.asp?category=R2438
>>
>> https://www.jjengineersindia.com/lightning-protection-system.html
>>
>> https://www.jmvearthing.com/early-streamer-emmission.html
>>
>> This one has some snake oil type of hype too:
>>
>> http://www.lps-pacifica.com/Ellips.html
>>
>> Ever read “Something Wicked This Way Comes”?
>>
>>
>> *From:* Matt Hoppes
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 22, 2019 7:16 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Active Lightning Suppressor - Snake Oil, or
>> Science?
>>
>> So if this is all snake oil - why do some commercial towers have some
>> variation of this at the top?
>>
>> That’s what I’m trying to understand.
>>
>> An engineer for clear channel told me he’s seen a corona develop around
>> one of his towers that had a similar item on it when storms are coming
>> through the area.
>>
>> On May 22, 2019, at 2:56 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> My SO is unusually wary of lightning and lightning strikes. If there is
>> the slightest hint of lightning or thunder, she reverts to the air gap
>> method of lightning protection. If there are no wires connected to a piece
>> of electronics, then it is most safe.
>>
>> Doesn't help a lot in our business, but that is what she does.
>>
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 5/22/2019 11:51 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>
>> Are you suggesting that if you power off the equipment during a lightning
>> strike it won’t take damage? Why would that be?
>>
>> On May 22, 2019, at 2:42 PM, dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I have been working with this AS3935 franklin lightning sensor for about
>> 6 months now and learned so much more about lighting and its projected
>> energies and possible frequencies its amazing how this little sensor can
>> detect distance and the amount of energy BEFORE it strikes.
>> So,armed with this ability I am solely working on a design along with IR
>> sensing to help mitigate damage to a site during a storm.
>>
>> I am still working on the timing to be able to shut down power to the
>> gear outside for a time period at which if lightning is still present
>> remain off till storm passes.
>>
>> End of Run sites are the worst but knock on wood after a year or 2 of
>> planning and cleaning up the existing grounds everything seems well.
>>
>>
>>
>> <Vcard.jpg>
>> On 5/22/19 9:23 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> This is from the executive director of the lightning protection
>> institute.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Bud VanSickle
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 7:41 AM
>> To: 'Chuck McCown'
>> Subject: RE: [AFMUG] Active Lightning Suppressor - Snake Oil, or Science?
>>
>> Snake oil for sure.  You can't stop lightning strikes because of the
>> volume
>> of energy and short time period.  If you put one of these devices on a
>> fully
>> grounded metallic tower, it would most likely take a strike to ground.
>> Of
>> course, if you ground your metallic tower properly, it is like a giant
>> lightning rod, so you are out the money for this "topper".  By the way,
>> on
>> tall towers, lightning doesn't necessarily strike the top anyway - it is
>> almost never straight vertical and may be at a 45 degree angle to the
>> side.
>> But let me ask you this - if all the pine needles in a forest can release
>> ions (which they can and do) or all the blades of grass on the prairie,
>> why
>> does lightning still strike there?
>> Bud VanSickle
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chuck McCown [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 7:51 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Fw: [AFMUG] Active Lightning Suppressor - Snake Oil, or Science?
>>
>> I think snake oil.  You?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Lewis Bergman
> 325-439-0533 Cell
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to