Any idea how much transport or transit will cost using these birds?
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 Matt Hoppes <[email protected]> wrote:
Are you sure about that?  Because as of earlier this year the links are 
still being put in in Pennsylvania.

On 6/18/19 4:16 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Most serious HFT moved to shortwave type links a while back, the 
> microwave path between the CME and New Jersey is obsolete...  Think big 
> ass yagi-uda antennas, dipoles, much lower frequencies, very low data 
> rates.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 4:02 PM Bill Prince <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>    This is the best explanation I've seen (so far) of how the system is
>    expected to work. One thing I didn't think about was the low
>    latency. This video speculates that it will have lower latency than
>    trans-Atlantic fiber. Ergo, this may become the new darling of flash
>    traders.
> 
>        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giQ8xEWjnBs
> 
>    bp
>    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> 
>    On 6/3/2019 11:19 AM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>    I wonder how snow on the cpe antenna will affect things.
>>    *From:* Bill Prince
>>    *Sent:* Monday, June 3, 2019 12:16 PM
>>    *To:* [email protected]
>>    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] SpaceX Says Its 60 Starlink Satellites Are
>>    All Phoning Home (and Fading Out) | Space
>>
>>    That would be per satellite. So it doesn't really tell us what the
>>    system capacity is. Don't forget there will be ~ 600 satellites
>>    per ring, and (I think) 24 rings.
>>
>>    bp
>>    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>    On 6/3/2019 10:18 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>    People always ask about system capacity, but it's simpler than
>>>    that.  Their FCC filings show 2ghz of spectrum for the downlink
>>>    from satellite to user terminal.  They have two polarities, not
>>>    unlike us.  We could generously assume they'll get 10 bits/hz. 
>>>    That's 20gbps in a given geographic area.  It doesn't matter how
>>>    many satellites there are, or what the capacity of a given
>>>    satellite is.  I don't know how big that geographic area will be
>>>    exactly.
>>>
>>>    -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>>    On 6/2/2019 6:15 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    There are whole bunches of risk factors.
>>>>
>>>>    Assuming the satellite-mesh system works (and that is still an
>>>>    if; note that this first batch does not include the sat-sat
>>>>    laser link capability), I have not seen a real estimate of the
>>>>    system capacity. I would presume there would be separate earth
>>>>    stations for each orbital plane. There could even conceivably be
>>>>    multiple earth stations for each orbital plane, which would make
>>>>    the system capacity flexible.
>>>>
>>>>    IDK if they're making money or not, but they are serving body
>>>>    blows to the competition.
>>>>
>>>>    There was open speculation that the Falcon heavy was going into
>>>>    a limited demand situation, but now that it seems to be working
>>>>    (so far), that market opportunity may be shifting as well.
>>>>
>>>>    bp
>>>>    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>    On 6/2/2019 12:52 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    You’d think that SpaceX is highly profitable and is using those
>>>>>    profits to expand into the satellite Internet business.  But
>>>>>    actually there is debate whether SpaceX is profitable without
>>>>>    accounting tricks, and even if it is profitable, the margins
>>>>>    are very thin. Reportedly the geostationary launch business is
>>>>>    softening, and SpaceX is actually looking to Starlink for
>>>>>    profits.  No doubt it helps if you can launch your own
>>>>>    satellites, maybe even having them ride along while you get
>>>>>    paid to launch stuff for paying customers.  But this sounds
>>>>>    like a pretty risky venture, paid for with borrowed money.  If
>>>>>    it wasn’t risky, it wouldn’t be Elon, right?____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    *From:* AF mailto:[email protected] *On Behalf Of *Mike
>>>>>    Hammett
>>>>>    *Sent:* Sunday, June 2, 2019 12:04 PM
>>>>>    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] SpaceX Says Its 60 Starlink Satellites
>>>>>    Are All Phoning Home (and Fading Out) | Space____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    I would suspect they are going to have hundreds of earth
>>>>>    stations as opposed to one or two earth stations that legacy
>>>>>    platforms have. Up to the bird, maybe across one or two birds,
>>>>>    and back down to the fiber-fed earth stations. I've seen the
>>>>>    numbers, but I forgot the numbers. It's real bandwidth at each
>>>>>    one.____
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    -----
>>>>>    Mike Hammett
>>>>>    Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>>>    
>>>>><https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>    Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>>>    
>>>>><https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>    The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>>>    <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>____
>>>>>
>>>>>    
>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>    *From: *"Tim Withrow via AF" <[email protected]>
>>>>>    *To: *[email protected]
>>>>>    *Cc: *"Tim Withrow" <[email protected]>
>>>>>    *Sent: *Saturday, June 1, 2019 4:43:01 PM
>>>>>    *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] SpaceX Says Its 60 Starlink Satellites
>>>>>    Are All Phoning Home (and Fading Out) | Space____
>>>>>
>>>>>    What kind of bandwidth  capacity could each satellite have  at
>>>>>    any given point?
>>>>>    What is the usable bandwidth of their system?  Who makes a
>>>>>    radio that big to carry/transmit such  capacity or is it an
>>>>>    aggregate of small radio's?____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    
>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>    On Saturday, June 1, 2019 Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:____
>>>>>
>>>>>    Naturally, we're all thinking about what effect this will have
>>>>>    in rural America, but I am also wondering if this would have
>>>>>    some effect on China's "great firewall"?____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    bp____
>>>>>    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>____
>>>>>    ____  
>>>>>
>>>>>    On 6/1/2019 1:47 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:____
>>>>>
>>>>>    I think one factor advocacy groups and govt critters need to
>>>>>    keep in mind is that instead of robust competition, what could
>>>>>    occur is “disruptive” pricing, having the effect of
>>>>>    discouraging or bankrupting the competition.  And now some new
>>>>>    entrant is the only game in town.  And if it turns out to be
>>>>>    unreliable, or not to  have enough capacity,  or their speeds
>>>>>    are actually best effort, or their satellites start dropping
>>>>>    out of the sky, or whatever, people can’t switch back to their
>>>>>    old provider. Like being dissatisfied with online stores and
>>>>>    assuming you can always switch back to the old brick and mortar
>>>>>    store, from Uber and Lyft back to taxis and limos.  Sorry, they
>>>>>    don’t exist anymore.____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    This is unlikely to happen in big cities, I doubt Comcast will
>>>>>    go bankrupt because of Starlink.  But to just assume there will
>>>>>    be lots of choices out in the middle of nowhere driving the
>>>>>    price down without any of them turning off the lights, seems a
>>>>>    little naïve.____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    And to assume big megacorps like SpaceX, Amazon, Googe, 
>>>>>    Facebook, etc. would never price below cost to be “disruptive”
>>>>>    also seems naïve.____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    *From:*AF mailto:[email protected] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
>>>>>    *Sent:* Saturday, June 1, 2019 3:20 PM
>>>>>    *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] SpaceX Says Its 60 Starlink Satellites
>>>>>    Are All Phoning Home (and Fading Out) | Space____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    Sure. But after the clouds, geostationary still needs to go
>>>>>    another 23,000 miles. LEO only has to go a few hundred.____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    bp____
>>>>>    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>____
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    On 6/1/2019 10:47 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:____
>>>>>
>>>>>        Clouds are generally a lot lower than a couple hundred
>>>>>        miles... ____
>>>>>
>>>>>        ____
>>>>>
>>>>>        On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 10:58 AM Bill Prince
>>>>>        <[email protected]> wrote:____
>>>>>
>>>>>            Maybe at geostationary distances, but these are only a
>>>>>            few hundred miles up.
>>>>>
>>>>>            bp
>>>>>            <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>>            On 6/1/2019 8:56 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>>            > Don't those bands have significant attenuation issues
>>>>>            with like...
>>>>>            > clouds?
>>>>>            >
>>>>>            > On 6/1/19 10:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>>>>            >> According to Wikipedia, they will be on Ku, Ka, and
>>>>>            V bands.
>>>>>            >>
>>>>>            >>
>>>>>            
>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_(satellite_constellation)
>>>>>            >>
>>>>>            >> bp
>>>>>            >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>            >>
>>>>>            >> On 6/1/2019 7:46 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>>>>            >>> Wonder what frequencies they will use?
>>>>>            >>>
>>>>>            >>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>https://www.space.com/spacex-starlink-satellites-phone-home-dimming.html
>>>>>
>>>>>            >>>
>>>>>            >>>
>>>>>            >>
>>>>>
>>>>>            -- 
>>>>>            AF mailing list
>>>>>            [email protected]
>>>>>            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com____
>>>>>
>>>>>        ____
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>    -- 
>>>>>    AF mailing list
>>>>>    [email protected]
>>>>>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com____
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    -- 
>>>>>    AF mailing list
>>>>>    [email protected]
>>>>>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com____
>>>>>
>>>>>    ____
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    -- 
>>    AF mailing list
>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>    -- 
>    AF mailing list
>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> 

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to