"Utah recording law stipulates that it is a one-party consent state. In
Utah, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use
communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the
consent of at least one person taking part in the communication."
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 4:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT recording meetings (WAS: Re: OT Cell blocking)
Generally audio recordings are considered illegal unless the targets are
informed. It also varies by state.
https://www.protectamerica.com/home-security-blog/faqs/are-security-cameras-allowed-to-record-audio-three-interesting-facts_20574
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/7/2019 3:28 PM, [email protected] wrote:
I had a guy clumsily push an ipod toward me during a contentious board
meeting once. It was painfully obvious what he was doing.
Later when they sued me, I had my guys ask him about it during a
deposition. He said yes, he did record the meeting. Then when we asked
for a copy of the recording during discovery... gosh, they had lost the
file...
I also found out that employees are frequently recording meetings when you
are doing any kind of corrective action with them. Not a lot you can do
about it as Utah is a one party state.
-----Original Message----- From: John Osmon
Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 12:16 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: [AFMUG] OT recording meetings (WAS: Re: OT Cell blocking)
Wandering off topic even more...
There was a local businessman known for recording conversations. The
last meeting I had with him I told him that I'd forgotten to bring any
recoding equipment, and that I'd appreciate a copy of what he was going
to have.
He never acknowledged my statement by voice, or action. He just kept on
with the meeting as if I'd never said anything. One of the more surreal
moments in my life.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:00:53PM -0700, Jaime Solorza wrote:
Yes...of course...
They used an Texas Department of Public Safety Officer to secure their
phones before executive session...one board member opposed it ...as it
turned out , she was the one who was giving confidential information to
fired superintendent.
The months preceding board meetings made headlines...news people always
present. Other distracts would have watch parties... embarrassing.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 11:31 AM Jay Weekley <[email protected]>
wrote:
> They could still record couldn't they?
>
> Jaime Solorza wrote:
> > Interesting...since most reservations are lacking in Internet and
> > Cellular coverage.
> > I was asked by a board member at school district to block cellphones
> > in executive conference room as they suspected some members where
> > using them to record and also have fired superintendent listen in.
> > Told him it was illegal.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 9:43 AM <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > Visiting with a friend this morning he indicated he is traveling
> > to coach a HS basketball game at a school on a reservation. He
> > said that I will not be able to contact him while there because
> > they have a cell call blocker to keep kids from looking at their
> > phones.
> > I did not realize blockers became legal. ?? Maybe sovereign
> > nations preempt the FCC?
> > --
> > AF mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> *Jay Weekley*
> *Cyber Broadband
> *
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
