We have lots of 3000L's running... I haven't seen any major performance differences between them and the 1000/2000 as far as noise, etc., but they do get a bit more capacity when 256QAM works. I can't comment on QoS, since I don't use it anyway, but as far as hardware reliability goes, I haven't seen any failures that I didn't cause (feeding them power on the wrong pins causes bad things... ).
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:59 AM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't try the 4x4 one, no. > > > On 1/22/2020 11:57 AM, Josh Baird wrote: > > Have you use the MIMO version (non-L)? We saw immediate improvements > after replacing ePMP 2K sectors with al 802.11n based clients. > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:54 AM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I tried an ePMP 3000L. >> >> Real world performance is ultimately about the same as ePMP 2000. QoS >> doesn't work properly. SM was re registering with a pretty minimal >> amount of noise. I had 27 DL SNR and 17 UL SNR on a DFS band......it's >> not going to get a lot better than that where I am. Not in real life >> anyway. >> >> First AP wouldn't link at 1Gig on a long cable (but would on a short >> cable). Tried a second AP and that one worked at 1Gig, but then died 4 >> days later. >> >> I got a lot of mileage out of the ePMP 2000 and the PMP450, but this new >> product does not currently impress. It's sort of a little bit shitty >> in fact. >> >> Maybe they'll bake out some of the issues later. >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
