I checked some of their registrations, and it looks like they're mostly
PMP450 and a few Ubiquiti radios. It's been awhile since I've done anything
with Canopy 3.65ghz stuff, but it seems to me like you might be able to set
them that high... or maybe they have some non-US radios...

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:01 AM Dennis Burgess via AF <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Wonder what gear they were using. ☹  That allowed them to transmit that
> high?
>
>
>
>
>
> *[image: LTI-Full_175px]*
>
>
> *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE,
> MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium ePMP Certified *
>
> Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
>
> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>
> *Office*: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>
> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of * Tim Hardy
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 7:21 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation
> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
>
>
>
> According to the Notice of Violation, they were found to be operating on
> 3723 - 3732 MHz which is a clear violation of 1.903 and you’re right that
> this is how they got caught.  No question that had they not interfered with
> the ground station, this wouldn’t have come up.  Once the FCC finds one
> thing, they’re going to look at everything else and that’s how the
> unregistered locations ended up part of this.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:25 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There seem to be 2 issues, one is unregistered locations which seems kind
> of petty, the other is transmitting above 3.7 GHz.  I’m going to assume the
> second one got them in trouble and led to finding the first one?
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:43 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation
> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
>
>
>
> The 320 you could go to at least 3695 on 10mhz. Plus the oob so if it was
> low 3700. But jerkoffs like that that don't even make a cursory check for
> earth stations you never know what they've done.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 5:03 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jamming C band CATV...
>
>
>
> *From:* Mathew Howard
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:59 PM
>
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation
> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
>
>
>
> It's interesting that the signal they were interfering with was in the
> 3700-4200mhz band. I wonder what they were doing...
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Isnt that the first 3ghz one?
>
>
>
> I wish that more people had been nailed, its said other "license" holders
> had no recourse, it took a fixed station to be interfered with
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:35 PM Tim Hardy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> BREVARD WIRELESS, INC. DBA FLORIDA HIGH SPEED INTERNET, LICENSEE OF
> STATION WQMJ660. Brevard Wireless, Inc. dba Florida High Speed Internet
> agrees to $16,000 settlement and compliance plan resolving investigation
> into unauthorized operation in the 3650-3700MHz band . Action by: Deputy
> Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 2020-01-22 by Order/Consent Decree. (DA
> No. 20-46). EB. DA-20-46A1.docx
> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.docx> DA-20-46A1.pdf
> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.pdf>DA-20-46A1.txt
> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.txt>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to