Because the fda doesnt approve without the trials, to avoid the liability. It's only approved off label use, hence, zero liability
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020, 10:12 PM Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > There is an actual mechanism for the FDA to avoid the liability, it's > baked into the system now. It's how the friends got the treatment approved > for their daughters. > > On 4/11/20 4:10 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > The FDA cant take the liability of "approving" anything without full > trials. I dont blame them. > > We let everyone sue everyone, we did it to ourselves. > > Same reason Fauci uses code words to say the malaria drug works without > saying it works or setting cnn off by agreeing with potus. > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020, 3:27 PM Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can't believe I am still hearing about "trials" on the pre-existing >> ebola treatment. Doctors are talking about 2/3's of test patients >> recovering after 2-3 days after administration. Seems like that would be >> a good enough "trial" to start massively treating patients instead of >> 20% survival.. What the heck is the real story? I know someone >> personally who fought the FDC to get a treatment that extended their >> daughters lives for 5 years and it was a nightmare. The conspiracy >> part of me wants to scream... >> >> On 4/11/20 12:50 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> > Yeah, I am starting to get annoyed at the obsession with having enough >> ventilators, describing them as "life saving equipment", leaving the >> impression that most can be saved if you can just put them on a >> ventilator. Yet stats out of NYC are 80% don't survive to come off the >> ventilator. And you have to wonder if the 20% who do, did the vent >> actually save them, or they would have survived even with less aggressive >> treatment. >> > >> > The news coverage leaves you thinking most of the ICU patients will be >> saved if there's enough ventilators. When in reality doctors and nurses >> are risking their own lives to treat ICU wards full of intubated, sedated >> patients most of whom will die because they don't have an effective >> treatment. Not a pretty story, probably why nobody wants to talk about it. >> > >> > There are trials of various treatments going on, it would be great if >> some of them turned out to work. Not necessarily a cure or a vaccine, but >> a therapy so less people die. >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bill Prince >> > Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 1:57 PM >> > To: AFMUG <[email protected]> >> > Subject: [AFMUG] OT: More on COVID >> > >> > >> > Saw this in our local paper this morning. It's interesting to me >> because it's bringing to light the fact that COVID-19 is apparently not >> what people are dying from, it's the secondary ARDS-like (Accute >> Respiratory Distress Syndrome) condition. There is also some debate within >> the medical community whether ventilators are helping or hurting. Maybe >> what they need to do is just supply oxygen. >> > >> > If this link doesn't work for you, I can email the article. >> > >> > >> https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/11/when-coronavirus-kills-its-like-death-by-drowning-and-doctors-disagree-on-best-treatment/ >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
