FCC has total authority over these bands.

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:29 PM Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]>
wrote:

> How can the FCC make spectrum available for un-licensed without an act of
> Congress?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:30 PM Erich Kaiser <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> yes you are right.
>>
>>
>> Erich Kaiser
>> North Central Tower
>> [email protected]
>> Office: 815-570-3101
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:12 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> More like 4.9 to 7.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Erich Kaiser
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:35 PM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New unlicensed spectrum
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Two of the UNII  bands are heavily used for licensed PTP and I mean
>>> heavily, so really if the AFC system works correctly most of the spectrum
>>> proposed will likely be unuseable outdoor.  I feel like from a reliability
>>> standpoint it will be tough to count on a system that uses AFC in general.
>>>  What about the Antenna being used on these APs are they going to be able
>>> to cover the entire band from 5Ghz to 6Ghz efficiently?  Just thinking...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erich Kaiser
>>>
>>> North Central Tower
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Office: 815-570-3101
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:24 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> from Fred Goldstein via the wispa list:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "There are really two different types of devices approved today. A
>>> Standard Power device, allowed +36 dBm EIRP, must communicate daily with an
>>> AFC that determines what frequencies are available at its location. It must
>>> have geolocation. (We are waiting to see the final Order to see how the
>>> "client AP" is handled.) The rules for the AFC are reasonably conservative,
>>> so the licensed PtP users are generally pretty happy with it. And a whole
>>> bunch of companies have already been working on AFCs.
>>>
>>>
>>> The Low Power Indoor device, on the other hand, does not require AFC. It
>>> is limited to indoor use only (must have mains power, may not be
>>> weatherproof, must be labeled) and is allowed +30 dBm EIRP (clients +24
>>> dBm). Since those can use any frequency, the incumbents are a wee bit
>>> concerned. But between building entry losses (pretty high at 6 GHz) and the
>>> directionality of the FS dishes, harmful interference is unlikely. That is
>>> likely to be a volume market for Wi-Fi 6e. The higher-end business stuff,
>>> and ours, will be standard power.
>>>
>>> The FNPRM asks about Very Low Power outdoor operation without AFC. Like
>>> cell phones and small hotspots. It also asks about higher power for
>>> AFC-controlled devices."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yep...lots of buzz from this
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 3:47 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> WISPA said they are waiting for them to release the order.  they are
>>> hoping it's 36db...there's a chance it's only 30db.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:42 PM Tim Withrow via AF <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I learned that the FCC approved 1200Mhz of unlicensed spectrum in 6
>>> Gigahertz today.
>>>
>>> any idea what Eirp they approved for fixed wireless?
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to