If you need more throughput in 11ghz can't you license two separate links for 11ghz and install two separate AVIAT radios and then the radios can bond both links together? I thought that was a feature that AVIAT had.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:21 AM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > Does Siae have the capability of running two channels per core, like was > discussed earlier on the Bridgewave and Aviat radios? > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:49 AM Tim Hardy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should be easy enough to check to ensure that you have two (2) dual core >> radios each transmitting a discrete frequency 60 MHz apart from one >> another. Anything else would lead one to believe that they actually are >> just using their ETSI configuration (112 MHz) within the 120 MHz block. >> Seems suspicious when two sets of radios are about the same cost as one. >> >> >> On Jun 4, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I’m not sure details other than I verified multiple times 120Mhz of >> actual usage and the speed matched. Our frequency coordinator worked with >> them on the rest... >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Jun 4, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Tim Hardy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one >> CCDP at 80 MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the >> two transmit frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require >> couplers and associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any >> attempt to stack an 80 and a 40 to get a 120 MHz block in order to “cover” >> the band for an ETSI 112 MHz bandwidth radio configuration would be >> strictly illegal in North America, and any single transmitter bandwidth >> greater than 80 MHz bandwidth (11 GHz) is likewise illegal. >> >> On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:28 AM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> 11Ghz is 80MHz per channel, plus another 40Mhz= 120Mhz (two channels per >> polarity). But the channels have to be stacked and available. >> Ignore the promos and prices. Tell him what price you need to be at and >> he will try to make it happen. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:36 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Jon, >> >> I'm pretty dumb with this stuff, is this possibly two descrete 60mhz >> channels per TX side? >> >> TJ >> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jon Langeler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> 11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX. >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> What band can you do 120mhz in? >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all >>>> the same >>>> >>>> Jon Langeler >>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two. >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's >>>>> called a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The >>>>>> Bridgewave has some other magic. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core >>>>>>> version is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably in >>>>>>> part due to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput >>>>>>>> (~3Gbps if you have the channels available). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each >>>>>>>> capable of ~1.4Gbps. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat >>>>>>>>> WTM4200 vs Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Jason >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
