We just did our first fiber build. We were going into an area we already had 
hundreds of customers, planned it all out went to the township to get the 
permit. Then we find out Cogeco who was sitting on that project for 5+ years 
was planning on doing it too. They caught wind of us being ready to do it . 
They had no plans to do it anytime soon but as soon as we were ready to dig, 
they were. (go figure) So we ended up doing a dual build and split the costs of 
the install. It actually saved us a lot of money and we pretty much retained 
all of our customers in the process. 

[ https://www.wavedirect.net/ |    ] 
[ https://www.facebook.com/ruralhighspeed ] [ 
https://www.instagram.com/wave.direct/ ] [ 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/wavedirect-telecommunication/ ] [ 
https://twitter.com/wavedirect1 ] [ https://www.youtube.com/user/WaveDirect ] 
        STEVEN KENNEY 
DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY & CONTINUITY A: 158 Erie St. N | Leamington ON 
E: [email protected] | P: 519-737-9283 
W: www.wavedirect.net 


From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> 
To: "af" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 6:46:25 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] public-private fiber models 



They probably could. 


On 10/13/2020 5:57 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



Can the county sell IRUs as opposed to the underlying asset? 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
[ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent
            Computing Solutions ] 
[ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL ] [ 
https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb ] [ 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions ] [ 
https://twitter.com/ICSIL ] 
[ http://www.midwest-ix.com/ | Midwest
            Internet Exchange ] 
[ https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix ] [ 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange ] [ 
https://twitter.com/mdwestix ] 
[ http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/ | The
            Brothers WISP ] 
[ https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp ] [ 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg | 
            
            
           ] 

From: "Adam Moffett" [ mailto:[email protected] | <[email protected]> ] 
To: [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 3:00:44 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] public-private fiber models 



Sadly we're literally not allowed to own it. It's a USDA "ReConnect" grant. The 
grant awardee is the muni. USDA will have a hand on the wheel and their 
contract will literally not allow anyone but the awardee to own the network. 

We could potentially buy the network afterwards with USDA approval, but I'm 
told it's an uphill battle to get approved. 


It might be possible to structure the agreement so the muni owns it on paper 
and we have full control in reality. But whatever agreement we make has to be 
approved by the USDA. I might have to get them on the horn and see what they'd 
prefer. 





On 10/13/2020 3:05 PM, Steven Kenney wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

It'll start out like most marriages. That should be all you need to know. I'd 
keep an eye on the divorce rates :) In my case I have the perfect wife.. but 
dealing with municipalities and government you can expect your wife to be a 
"Karen". 

I'd ensure you own the fiber and have access to work on the fiber. But 
guarantee them X amount of bandwidth over X period of time, you'll provide the 
labor and monitoring for all their connections. Get it in front of a lawyer. If 
shit goes downhill you both will be covered. Just make sure any future projects 
with them won't get squashed. 

[ https://www.wavedirect.net/ |    ] 
[ https://www.facebook.com/ruralhighspeed ] [ 
https://www.instagram.com/wave.direct/ ] [ 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/wavedirect-telecommunication/ ] [ 
https://twitter.com/wavedirect1 ] [ https://www.youtube.com/user/WaveDirect ] 
        STEVEN KENNEY 
DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY & CONTINUITY A: 158 Erie St. N | Leamington ON 
E: [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ] | P: 519-737-9283 
W: [ http://www.wavedirect.net/ | www.wavedirect.net ] 


From: "Adam Moffett" [ mailto:[email protected] | <[email protected]> ] 
To: "af" [ mailto:[email protected] | <[email protected]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:36:13 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] public-private fiber models 

Anybody have direct experience with public-private partnerships as far 
as what works and what doesn't? 

I'm discussing with a county gov that has funding to build a network, 
and they're open to almost anything. The nature of their funding 
requires that they own the network. The nature of their knowledge level 
is that they have no idea how to be the network owner. So essentially 
it has to be a public-private partnership of some type. 

My first thought was we could lease fiber miles from them and own the 
electronics. They keep the lease payments in a fund which they use to 
pay for repairs. We could do repairs and send them bills based on an 
agreed upon fee schedule. 

Naturally I'd prefer exclusive access and I'm sure they'd prefer open 
access. I think my biggest argument in favor of exclusive access is 
when you have a problem there's only one throat to choke. 


-- 
AF mailing list 
[ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ] 
[ http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com | 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com ] 




-- 
AF mailing list 
[ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ] 
[ http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com | 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com ] 



BQ_END

-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to