I'm a few days late to this thread (this last week seemed unusually busy) but I won't touch life safety stuff. Not worth the liability. My recommendation is always cellular. Our advice if they don't want to go to cellular is keep the landline from the phone company for that... but move your phones/etc. over to VoIP.
The margin is in the VoIP phone systems... not providing a phone line for alarm. photograph Daniel White Co-Founder phone: +1 (702) 470-2770 direct:+1 (702) 470-2766 > Lewis Bergman <mailto:[email protected]> > October 27, 2020 at 12:11 > Yeah, Cellular is the most widely accepted solution. NYC allows it and > there aren't any I know of that are more strict than they are. In > addition, It can be a lot easier. > > > > -- > Lewis Bergman > 325-439-0533 Cell > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > October 27, 2020 at 08:47 > There is no money in the one off elevator or fire alarm circuit to > even touch the perceived liability. Let them use cellular if they > cannot get POTS from the ILEC. I know of a “very large – very very > large” data center that is located in a city that is 100% FTTH. The > local ILEC had to go dig some old DLC out of the trash because they > absolutely had to have 16 POTS lines. and could not have the POTS > that came out of an ONT. > > *From:* Lewis Bergman > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 27, 2020 8:11 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] POTS for "life safety" - MFVN > > Many VoIP providers won't touch elevators or fire alarm circuits. We > don't mind but many municipalities require permitting, acceptance, > etc. It wouldn't be difficult if you are willing to work with us and > if the opportunity is worth the trouble. We (or someone else) would > need to install at least 2 machines in your NOC or data center. That > would be used as the primary softswitch within your network with our > other clusters as backups. > > You should contact your municipalities and state to see what exactly > would have to be done for your areas. Most I have seen don't have > specific state regs, they leave it up to the cities but every place is > different. > > > > -- > Lewis Bergman > 325-439-0533 Cell > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > Lewis Bergman <mailto:[email protected]> > October 27, 2020 at 08:11 > Many VoIP providers won't touch elevators or fire alarm circuits. We > don't mind but many municipalities require permitting, acceptance, > etc. It wouldn't be difficult if you are willing to work with us and > if the opportunity is worth the trouble. We (or someone else) would > need to install at least 2 machines in your NOC or data center. That > would be used as the primary softswitch within your network with our > other clusters as backups. > > You should contact your municipalities and state to see what exactly > would have to be done for your areas. Most I have seen don't have > specific state regs, they leave it up to the cities but every place is > different. > > > > -- > Lewis Bergman > 325-439-0533 Cell > > > Brough Turner <mailto:[email protected]> > October 27, 2020 at 06:57 > > Is there a way to "white label" Managed Facilites-based Voice Network > (MFVN) services? I recognize MFVN service requires the softswitch and > gateway be in the network (our network), but that would be ok if we > could out-source configuration and operation to someone else and, for > this service, be a subcontractor to that service provider. > > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
