Aviat links "aren't SAF latency?" What latency are you seeing on your WTM4200 vs SAF links? I wouldn't expect it to be much different in ideal circumstances.
I wouldn't call them "low cost" either. When I think "low cost," I think AF11X. On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:42 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > We have been putting up a handful of 11ghz links lately and are running > out of available channels in a relatively small footprint. We are limited > to 5 to 8 miles because of antenna size limits. Grain legs wont support > large than 3 foot antennas and many are to sketchy to go above 2 foot. Most > of our rooftop locations wont support larger than 3 foot > ballast/tray/equipment weight and none of our leases on rooftops allow > anything other than nprm. > Have we shot ourselves in the foot? Are 5 mile licensed links frowned upon? > We are really digging the wtm4200 aviat (they're not SAF latency) but they > meet our demand, price is right and support is good. But I'm wondering if > low cost radios got us greedy and spectrum rude. > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
