Since the top end costs 5 and 6 figures I'm ok putting SAF and AF11 in
the same bracket.
On 11/11/2020 8:37 AM, Josh Baird wrote:
Aviat links "aren't SAF latency?" What latency are you seeing on your
WTM4200 vs SAF links? I wouldn't expect it to be much different in
ideal circumstances.
I wouldn't call them "low cost" either. When I think "low cost," I
think AF11X.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:42 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We have been putting up a handful of 11ghz links lately and are
running out of available channels in a relatively small footprint.
We are limited to 5 to 8 miles because of antenna size limits.
Grain legs wont support large than 3 foot antennas and many are to
sketchy to go above 2 foot. Most of our rooftop locations wont
support larger than 3 foot ballast/tray/equipment weight and none
of our leases on rooftops allow anything other than nprm.
Have we shot ourselves in the foot? Are 5 mile licensed links
frowned upon?
We are really digging the wtm4200 aviat (they're not SAF latency)
but they meet our demand, price is right and support is good. But
I'm wondering if low cost radios got us greedy and spectrum rude.
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
