IANAL but if I wanted to do an audit, I’d just check against Google Earth for 
lat/lon and ground elevation.  That’s close enough nobody will care about the 
difference.

 

For azimuth, if you have the lat/lon of each end, you can calculate azimuth, 
assuming the antennas were aligned properly.  If the RSSI is within a few dB of 
target, they were aligned properly.  You can find azimuth by drawing a line on 
Google Earth, or using something like LinkPlanner.

 

I’d mostly be worried about xmt freq, channel width, and xmt power matching the 
license.  It would be easy to miss the fact that frequency coordination showed 
you needed to dial back the xmt power, or to make a mistake and be on the wrong 
frequency.  Those would be bad errors.

 

Tougher one to audit would be AGL.  You coordinate the link, apply for your 
license, then tell the tower guys to mount the dish at 100 feet.  But how do 
they determine 100 feet?  Count tower sections?  Foot markers on cable?  Tape 
drop?  Laser rangefinder?  Maybe there’s a beacon light at the 100 feet so they 
put it at 90 or 110.  Or there’s a nice abandoned mount at 120 feet so they put 
it there.

 

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 11:44 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC coordinate verification

 

hypothetical, If FCC was coming I would be freaking out. I just spend a lot of 
time nervous about all our licensed links and one day finding out we are just 
outside the margin, particularly on amsl. We use the smart aligner now to 
verify the coordinate, but I assume FCC has more accurate meter than me. Or I'm 
completely off and FCC equates to whoever FCC contract to come.

 

I can look at tolerance charts all day, but If I dont know what the tolerance 
is measured against, what value is it. Like if I want to get super accurate on 
weights I can go steal one of the ones in the jars and compare it to my weights

 

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:02 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

When I had our frequency coordinator do an FAA application for us (licensed 
link on tower near airport) and mentioned the discussion here about 2C surveys, 
they acted like I was crazy.  Are you sure this is required?

 

Steve, is this hypothetical, or is the FCC paying you a visit?

 

I know one time I discovered the commercial tower we were on had the lat/lon 
wrong on the ASR.  For us to fix out license, they had to also fix the ASR.  It 
was just a matter of filing a modification.  I also seem to remember something 
about it wasn’t significant unless it was off by at least 1 second or something.

 

Honestly I just use the numbers from my Garmin 64st, same as for CPI data for 
CBRS.  Given several minutes it will usually state accuracy within <10 feet.  I 
check it against Google Earth and they usually match to better than that.  Even 
the elevation AMSL usually matches.  If there was a need for a survey I would 
think it would have to be for AMSL, there’s just no rational reason to need a 
surveyor to certify the lat/lon these days.

 

 

From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf 
Of Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 10:41 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC coordinate verification

 

im asking about if you get nailed by the FCC, not application

 

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:13 AM Cameron Crum <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Typically if you are filing for FAA or FCC you have to supply coordinates from 
a 2C survey mimium. They assume a certified survey is good enough. 

 

 

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:02 AM Steve Jones <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Have any of you guys ever had the FCC verify your transmitter data?

What equipment do they use to verify elevation and coordinate?

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to