Sorry which vendor has a2c+? Google fu not worky

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 1:32 PM Peter Kranz via AF <[email protected]> wrote:

> A2C power hit at higher modulations is resolved by the newly released A2C+
> hardware. So you can do a 2x80Mhz in the same polarity, single core,
> without a splitter or other downsides now.
>
>
>
>
> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
> Mobile: 510-207-0000
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Tim Hardy
> *Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2021 12:21 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar
>
>
>
> The dual-core WTM-4200 radio only suffers a coupler loss hit. I think
> you’re referencing the single-core WTM-4100 using Adaptive Dual Carrier
> (A2C) which has a significant power hit at 1024 QAM and above.
>
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2021, at 3:01 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yeah, you can do 2 x 80mhz channels with a single core on some radios, but
> there are some limitations. Depending on the radio, my understanding is
> that they have to either be adjacent, or very near each other (definitely
> within the same sub-band). It seems to me that some radios can even do two
> different sizes of channels (like 1 80mhz + 1 40mhz), but I could be
> remembering that wrong. If I understand it right, the Aviat radios have a
> significant tx power hit when you activate that feature, which probably
> makes it unusable in a lot of cases. We're doing that on a Bridgewave 11ghz
> link (using 4x 80mhz on a dual core radio), and there's it works fine, with
> only a minor performance hit on those radios. SIAE does have that feature
> as well, but I don't remember if there was a significant performance hit or
> not... I think they may have been the ones that could use two different
> sizes of channels.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 1:51 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Probably, LinkPlanner is pretty smart.
> I assume you don't want to use 2 antennas.
> There are some licensed radios now that I think can do 2 x 80 MHz channels
> in a single core, like from Aviat or SIAE maybe, I don't know if this gets
> around the splitter cost and performance issues.  I may have that feature
> completely wrong, I haven't looked into it.  There could also be a
> performance hit by using the same xmt power amp for 160 MHz.
> I also haven't checked out the full feature set of the new PTP850C, the
> only thing I know it has is SFP+.
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
> Sent: 1/4/2021 1:30:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar
>
> Ok yeah, the Link Planner BOM shows some splitters.  I wonder if Link
> Planner already accounted for the additional losses when I selected "Co
> Polar" on the dropdown.
>
>
> On 1/4/2021 2:25 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> > I seem to remember that different channel different polarization is the
> best, if your radio manufacturer charges for an XPIC license key.  Next
> best is XPIC.  And that the problem with different channel same
> polarization is you need a splitter which costs several dB of system gain.
> But that's from memory, and mine is not so reliable.
> >
> > ---- Original Message ----
> > From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 1/4/2021 1:16:26 PM
> > To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar
> >
> > I'm looking at a path where the coordinator can get me two 50mhz XPIC
> > channels, or two 80mhz H-Pol channels.
> >
> > I've never installed co-polar.  Do you need a lot of extra junk to make
> > that work?
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to