You should be able to do it. You will have to run Exchange hybrid servers either on-prem or in a DC somewhere. In Active Directory, you put an alias on the users for [email protected] for their O365 account, then make that the routing address for their accounts. Your inbound email would come into those hybrid servers. For the users in O365, the hybrid servers will route mail to that destination. You can then have it route all other mail wherever it needs to go.
You can also have the email come into the O365 environment, and (I THINK!), send all the unmatched mail to the hybrid servers to handle. Then an SMTP policy there to route to whatever customer email servers you are using. For customer->company email, you'd have to be able to route any non-local users to exchange. Ryan On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:11 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Send AF mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of AF digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Microsoft vs Google (Steve Jones) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:10:01 -0500 > From: Steve Jones <[email protected]> > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Microsoft vs Google > Message-ID: > < > cagoa4nou_1wcbebu3p+1fhp-eu-lkoajpooasjqtsie9cp1...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > this thread got me looking at microsoft options again, im having issues > with our openfire server and trillian messenger not keeping in sync, its a > versioning issue. but it looks like teams has the old microsoft messenger > now, im betting this would solve that. > > we have an issue, our company email is also our customer email, we host at > rackspace, and we use hosted exchange for company emails through them, > customers are primarily pop. the whole shared domain with a 3rd party > hosted exchange thing has always been weird with resource visibility. > > Im looking at the microsoft options, anybody here doing the split domain > routing for email successfully? > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:50 AM Steven Kenney <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Well this is a case of combining a lot of people into 1 system who are > > used to their own systems. So some people prefer Google some prefer > > Microsoft and I need to be the voice of reason and break it down for all > to > > see. So the decision will be clear. > > > > > > [image: logo] <https://www.wavedirect.net/> > > <https://www.facebook.com/ruralhighspeed> > > <https://www.instagram.com/wave.direct/> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/wavedirect-telecommunication/> > > <https://twitter.com/wavedirect1> > > <https://www.youtube.com/user/WaveDirect> > > * STEVEN KENNEY * > > DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY & CONTINUITY A: 158 Erie St. N | > > Leamington ON > > E: [email protected] | P: 519-737-9283 > > W: www.wavedirect.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Darin Steffl" <[email protected]> > > *To: *"af" <[email protected]> > > *Sent: *Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:28:24 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Microsoft vs Google > > > > We love Google apps going on 9 years now. I've never been a fan of > > Microsoft. > > > > We also use slack but if Microsoft includes much of the functionality of > > slack and zoom in their offerings, it may be worth looking into for > someone > > wanting to switch. > > > > We love Google too much and have very few pain points so there is nothing > > driving us to even research an alternative. > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021, 3:41 PM David Coudron < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> We work with a number of mid to enterprise sized corporate clients as > >> part of our consulting practice. Within those communities, Google?s > >> toolset holds a very small piece of the market, if even countable. > >> Microsoft?s toolset, (Office 365 with Exchange, Teams, Sharepoint, > Outlook, > >> etc) seems to be very stable and very secure. These organizations > spend a > >> lot of time looking at these kinds of things. > >> > >> > >> > >> Additionally, these same organizations are moving their applications > >> environments to AWS and Azure in large volume. We are seeing > healthcare > >> organizations handling HIPAA and HITRUST requirements as well as strong > PCI > >> requirement driven movement. While we don?t have data points for these > >> kinds of movements, we are not seeing much push to move towards Google. > >> This same movement is pushing down to smaller and smaller organizations > all > >> the time. We recently had a client with 3 employees move from Google > to > >> Microsoft?s Office 365 as they struggled with some of the gaps in the > >> Google offering. > >> > >> > >> > >> The Teams client has been problematic as I understand it, however, for a > >> year, our consultants feel it surpasses Zoom and Webex. We don?t see > >> enough of Google Meet for that to even be a comparison. A big benefit > to > >> Teams is that includes the functionality of Slack (for the most part), > >> Zoom, and shared file systems/repositories. Additionally it is > integrated > >> into Outlook very well. > >> > >> > >> > >> All this being said, there are always reasons for organizations to pick > >> another option. My wife?s firm has been using Google for 6-7 years, > but > >> they are actively looking to move towards Microsoft, just hard to pull > the > >> trigger like that in a year like 2020. There are several reasons, not > the > >> least of which are: > >> > >> 1. You get an Office apps license for users that you pay extra for. > >> It is lots easier then managing separate Office and Google app > licenses. > >> 2. You get 1 TB of drive storage for each user allowing them to back > >> up their computer hard drives without having to purchase another > license > >> for something to do that. > >> 3. No need to have Slack and Teams, can do it all in Teams (they had > >> this before Hangout was mature enough) > >> 4. No need to have Zoom and Teams can do it all in Teams (they had > >> this before Meet was mature enough) > >> > >> > >> > >> Honestly, we really don?t see any 40 person organizations move to Google > >> from Office365. It is always the other way around. But obviously > that > >> is just our experience so take that for what it?s worth. (not much ?) > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> David Coudron > >> > >> > >> > >> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of * Steve Jones > >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:18 PM > >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Microsoft vs Google > >> > >> > >> > >> microsoft all the way. slower to adopt new toy tech, longer support of > >> outdated endpoints, stodgy old goats are reliable old goats. The whole > >> current security issue is a nothingburger to me as I assume google just > >> never comes clean > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:48 PM Steven Kenney <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> You have a choice of moving your office applications, all of its > >> documents, email server , video conferencing, project management and > other > >> applications from on prem to cloud based. > >> > >> > >> > >> Which one do you choose? > >> > >> > >> > >> One will cost more than the other for sure. > >> > >> One allows you to join a domain via Azure AD and set policies and remote > >> manage computers > >> > >> One will be better to bounce SSO and auth off. > >> > >> One is more reliable than the other. > >> > >> One is more trustworthy than the other (although both are deep in > >> government and alphabet agencies). > >> > >> One offers a nicer user experience for less technical people. IE: more > >> accessible / user friendly > >> > >> One offers a more granular experience for more technical people. > >> > >> One is more compatible with a wide variety of hardware and software > >> operating systems > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Consider this for a staff of 40 people half of which are technical half > >> which are not as technical. > >> > >> > >> > >> Which route would you go? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> [image: logo] <https://www.wavedirect.net/> > >> > >> <https://www.facebook.com/ruralhighspeed> > >> <https://www.instagram.com/wave.direct/> > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/wavedirect-telecommunication/> > >> <https://twitter.com/wavedirect1> > >> <https://www.youtube.com/user/WaveDirect> > >> > >> *STEVEN KENNEY * > >> *DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY & CONTINUITY * > >> > >> *A: 158 Erie St. N | Leamington ON E: [email protected] > >> <[email protected]> | P: 519-737-9283 W: www.wavedirect.net > >> <http://www.wavedirect.net>* > >> > >> -- > >> AF mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >> > >> -- > >> AF mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >> > > > > -- > > AF mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > > AF mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/private/af_af.afmug.com/attachments/20210318/cc314fee/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > ------------------------------ > > End of AF Digest, Vol 34, Issue 257 > *********************************** >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
