I have two...a panel one and a Rocket with the dual polarity antenna. Both
of them work.
You need them?

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021, 8:30 PM Jan-GAMs <[email protected]> wrote:

> While digging around for your museum stuff perhaps you can find me a
> rocket m900?
> On 3/25/21 6:29 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> I might have ARLan and NCR WaveLan cards somewhere in my batcave.
> I did see a Clarion (Solectek) and TTI bridge parts in a box of things ..
> I know I have Raytheon FHSS cards as well.
> Maybe I should go through my stuff and open up a museum.
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021, 10:39 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> In 10 years it will be trending to niche market for home use. We will
>> have fiber to the farm so it is what it is.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021, 11:26 AM jerry bickle <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Best to watch The Simpson’s for a glimpse into the future.  I’m pretty
>>> sure there’s time travel involved.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think RF Design hasn’t evolved much.  Simple N=1 reuse and cell splits
>>> are the method that’s been used successfully for decades.  Going smaller
>>> isn’t innovative.  MiMo is a big leap however.  Broader channels are the
>>> only way to deliver huge bandwidth.  Going higher and higher QAM doesn’t
>>> work well for mobile handsets and the diminishing returns and crazy timing
>>> necessary to maintain a high QAM other than a lab are not practical.  Small
>>> cells are UGLY.  They’re also close to the people and EMR is a concern to
>>> many.  The FCC has guidelines that I do trust but we’re not dealing with
>>> sites that are 100’ tall and every 1/2 mile now.  They’re on just about
>>> every street corner.  Most carriers are digging up the streets to bring
>>> fiber to each of these poles.  It’s an expensive deployment.  802.11ax is
>>> the best innovation I’ve seen and it is truly 5G more than anything else
>>> that’s out there.  8x8 and 12x12 MiMo and color coded streams for
>>> interference mitigation are a big difference maker.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerry Bickle
>>>
>>> President
>>>
>>> RF Design Services, LLC
>>>
>>> Cell: 405.650.3366
>>>
>>> Fax: 405.330.1310
>>>
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>
>>> WEB: www.rfdesignservices.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Adam Moffett <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> *Reply-To: *AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>> *Date: *Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 9:59 AM
>>> *To: *AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Wireless future
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any opinions on where wireless technology will evolve in the next 5
>>> years?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There's a compound annual growth in demand, and trying to think about
>>>
>>> how manufacturers will meet that going forward.  I'm assuming we can't
>>>
>>> count on bigger channels or more spectrum.  So what then?  More MU-MIMO
>>>
>>> chains?  Or is it going to have to be street level small cells (60ghz
>>>
>>> etc)?  Or something else?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We're investing heavily in fiber, as I know a lot of you are, but the
>>>
>>> wireless customers aren't going to go away.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> AF mailing list
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__af.afmug.com_mailman_listinfo_af-5Faf.afmug.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=oZldojrM2-7OE-SOcQyzFlyOFVuvqI9-MKCJpgPtw5o&m=bOiKRwWQBPYARG4WBm8Fvsompi82WCazDT9jImYirBk&s=y0OEvTCKA-uC0trV_bZmS0o2H7KqtGiFk0J4YCzSDSA&e=
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to