Yep, that is how it is done.  Special cabinet.  I don’t recall the type of 
light.  I built one once based on a spec, NIST or someone.  It was a big ass 
light I do remember that.  I think it was an arc light perhaps.  You had to do 
things to make sure there was uniform illumination etc.  

We were characterizing factory seconds that we got by the truck loads.  

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 1:59 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] solar panels

Yeah, I suppose some kind of continuous load that will take whatever the panel 
can put out....like a big resistor with a heat sink.

Then meter the WH output.  Do it in a dark room and have a constant light 
source that's the same for each panel being tested.  Mount each sample in the 
same position.  


Sounds simple in theory, but I ain't got the time for that stuff.




On 6/4/2021 3:54 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:

  It seems like it should be relatively simple to build a test setup where you 
could just shine some kind of a light on it, and measure the output compared to 
a new panel... whether or not it would be worth the bother for anybody to do 
that, is another matter.


  On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:42 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

    There must be a way...

    My Father-in-law works at a lab at Cornell where they wanted a number of 
panels with all exactly the same efficiency for a research project.  Not sure 
the test method, but obviously they figured one out.



    On 6/4/2021 3:05 PM, Steve Jones wrote:

      How do you guage a level of used on solar panels? Age? Visual issues? Can 
you test efficiency reliably, like set up a uv light and specified distance in 
dark room and measure output? As they age what's the curve look like on 
efficiency loss?

      On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 1:12 PM David Coudron <[email protected]> 
wrote:

        What you see on snail roads. 

        I am guessing they are smears of some kind that affect the clear top 
layer?

        Get Outlook for iOS

------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Bill Prince 
<[email protected]>
        Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 1:09:14 PM
        To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] solar panels 

        Some of the used ones list defects in the description. Saw one that 
said "cracked", and another said "snail tracks". WTH are snail tracks?



bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>On 6/4/2021 11:05 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:

          Ah, they are used.  I wonder how much used...

          From: Robert 
          Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 11:59 AM
          To: [email protected] 
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] solar panels

          I haven't seen anything that will beat this.  $45/panel for 224watts.

          
https://shop.signaturesolar.us/products/224w-60cell-silver-poly-solar-panel-by-sharp


          On 6/4/21 10:37 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:

            Who has the best deals for solar panels these days?

             


----------------------------------------------------------------------
          -- 
          AF mailing list
          [email protected]
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


           
        -- 
        AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


       
    -- 
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


   


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to