I thought about whether or not to reply because what seemed like a pointing out 
that it might be OK to respect the decision not to take this vaccine right now 
turned into a pretty hot topic and that wasn’t the intent.   The point wasn’t 
to advocate for no vaccination, ever, but to point out that we should respect 
someone’s decision to hold off for a bit.   Remember when the polio vaccine was 
messed up and early vaccinees (is that a word?) got the live virus by mistake 
and got sick.  Folks that weren’t first on that list were probably feeling 
pretty lucky.   Not suggesting that is happening now, but that there might be 
valid reasons to slow down the immense pressure and negative treatment of 
others for making a decision based their perception of the risk/reward of 
vaccination at this time.   A couple of things that might not make it such a 
black and white decision for some:

Here are the CDC stats for recent deaths.   I would be significantly more 
worried about contracting and dying from pneumonia at this point.   How many of 
you in the age range for the pneumonia vaccine take the vaccine?   Did you even 
know there was one?
https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/mortality.html

There has been a lot of discussion about herd immunity and why it is so 
important that everyone gets vaccinated right away.  Here is the data from a 
100% vaccinated country (by March of this year) of Gibraltar:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/gibraltar/
100% vaccination does not equal 100% protection in the case of every disease.   
Pretty good spike of cases long after 100% vaccination was achieved.   Once we 
get to high vaccination rates here, we’ll probably see the same.   This virus 
doesn’t appear to be like small pox, it seems to mutate more like influenza.

Hard to say for sure, but this disease will likely fall into the influenza, 
pneumonia category where we’ll get updated vaccines every year.   The CDC looks 
like they are already tracking it that way.   That will give folks lots of 
chances to yell at the idiots that chose to wait for FDA approval (which looks 
like it might be here as soon as August) 😊 so no need to waste all those words 
now.

I know this disease has been tough on the whole country, but we used to be a 
pretty light-hearted group on this email list.   It wasn’t my intent to 
minimize the disease’s impact (the CDC graph above shows have bad it is/was).  
This list had been very good about looking at facts and not resorting to 
demonizing folks.   It would be too bad if that is no longer the case.

My take away from the CDC information and other information being reported at 
the current time is this:
We are seeing the tailoff of this disease, which is incredibly encouraging.   
We will see spikes again.  Most importantly, the loss of life is very tragic 
and I am not attempting to minimize that.   But, this isn’t small pox, we are 
(unfortunately) not likely to see 100% eradication, but rather, see annual 
boosters and a continued presence of the disease past the next couple of years. 
  Hopefully that is not the case, but it will likely end up permanently on the 
mortality list somewhere between influenza and pneumonia despite our best 
efforts.   Again, could be way off base on this (my handwritten Dr’s degree is 
getting pretty old 😊)

Regards,


From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via AF
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 12:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Chuck McCown <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: OT somewhat political

I have developed some special glasses that detect the change of polarization of 
light reflected off of vaccinated people.  It will be like the walking dead.

Being slightly more serious, here is a quote from SCOTUS:

At question, then, was whether the “right to refuse vaccination” was among 
those protected personal liberties.

Justice John Marshall Harlan acknowledged the fundamental importance of 
personal freedom, but also recognized that “the rights of the individual in 
respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be 
subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the 
safety of the general public may demand.”

This was directly related to anti smallpox vaxxers in 1905.

From: Robert
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 11:26 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: OT somewhat political

Um, kinda wonder what the percentage of unvaxxed is that are walking around 
unmasked..   A shudder to think it's probably near 100%...
On 7/26/21 9:56 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
There's a major difference - Typhoid Mary knew that she was a carrier.
Somebody dancing through a crowd with a spray bottle of anthrax is 
intentionally trying to kill people.

An apparently healthy un-vaxxed person, taking reasonable precautions is 
nothing like that.

Sure, somebody that knows they're sick (or even has reason to think they might 
be) and goes out and slobbers all over the general public is a similar 
situation, but nobody is defending that.

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Chuck McCown via AF 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So, unvacinnated folk that get the virus and walk around for a few days 
breathing on the general public are OK with you?  Some are asymptomatic, others 
are just not feeling too poorly to stay home yet.  But they are a living 
breathing biological warfare machine.  And they can just run free?

How about if they had anthrax or rabies or the plague?  Doesn’t matter?

From: Dennis Burgess
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 6:00 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Cc: Chuck McCown
Subject: RE: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

Or that other person can ware the condom since they are so afraid of it, or 
maybe they should not be out in public?


[LTI-Full_175px]
Dennis Burgess

Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with 
www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com>
Need MikroTik Cloud Management: https://cloud.linktechs.net

From: AF <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of 
Chuck McCown via AF
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 6:20 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Chuck McCown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

AIDS was / Is 100% avoidable.  COVID is like someone with AIDS spraying you 
down with their precious bodily fluids by sneezing.  People have been 
prosecuted for infecting others with AIDS.  Why not COVID?  If you don’t want 
the vax, fine but you need a full body condom if you come within 100’ of 
another person.
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 23, 2021, at 4:24 PM, David Coudron 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

There are valid reasons for deciding to take this vaccine, the shingles 
vaccine, the flu vaccine, or a myriad of other medications.   Each decision 
should be based on risk/reward of that drug and the medical condition being 
treated.   To think that you know everyone’s medical situation better than they 
do doesn’t seem very feasible and awfully presumptive.   To call them selfish 
for making a decision they believe is in their best medical interest seems 
overly judgmental.     Yes, there are people are deciding not to take it simply 
because they think they shouldn’t be forced to take a medical treatment against 
their will.   You may feel that we should force them to take the treatment for 
the better good.   I doubt you would feel the same about mandatory castration 
of young men to curb overcrowding of the earth.   Obviously there is a line 
somewhere about forced treatment for the greater good.  I am not attempting to 
determine where that line is, only suggesting that folks have valid medical 
reasons for not deciding to take the vaccine and they shouldn’t be publicly 
shamed for making that decision.   It doesn’t seem that far fetched, but I am 
learning I see things differently than some other folks.   So be it.

I love the argument that we have to get vaccinated, but we still have to act 
like the vaccine doesn’t work in order to save the human race.   Seems like a 
disconnect there.

If we were really so worried about infecting others or causing harm to others, 
we would avoid all other activities that create risk for others.  We’d never 
drive a car, much less have a beer and get in a car.   I doubt that very many 
of us on this list can say that.  We would never allow the sale of fatty foods. 
  We would force each and everyone to get to a body mass within our accepted 
range.   Keep in mind life is risky.   We don’t need to do stupid things, but 
being alive carries with it the risk of dying.    We are all much more likely 
to die of heart disease, stroke related illness, or cancer than we are of 
Covid.   Those are just the facts.  Many folks make small adjustments to reduce 
the risk of those  likely causes of mortality, but have long ago passed on 
decisions to make big changes to eliminate the possibility of those causes of 
death.

I have long ago decided not to live in constant fear of these things.   While I 
chose to be vaccinated, I respect the right of folks to make the best choice 
for their situation.   I also respect the right of someone who is not in the 
best physical condition to eat a steak.   I realize that a drunk driver might 
kill me some day, but I respect the right of individuals to go to a bar and 
expect that most (but not all) are responsible enough not to drink and drive 
when they have had too much.

Keep in mind that this virus would have never come to our country if we never 
allowed anyone in or out of it.   But we understand that certain personal 
freedoms are worth the possibility of catching a disease that might kill us.   
I have a tough time with the mass hypochondria surrounding this situation.

Sorry, I am not meaning to make anyone mad, just trying to keep perspective.    
 I just don’t understand why folks get so bent out of shape if they are already 
vaccinated.   I guess they don’t believe the vaccine will work because if it 
does, there is nothing to worry about.

I wager that given Covid’s relation to influenza like viruses, that it is with 
us permanently.   We will have yearly updates to the vaccination, but we’ll 
never be rid of it.   Not because people aren’t getting vaccinated, but because 
it will always mutate ahead of the vaccine, just like the flu virus.   Please 
don’t take this as an argument to not work on vaccines, we absolutely should as 
it will save lives.   But as Carl pointed out below, vaccines aren’t 100% 
effective……. 😊

I will lay a friendly wager down.  Remember, we had a AIDS epidemic several 
years ago.   Did we force people to stop having sex or many of the other high 
risk things that led to AIDS?   Does anyone even talk about AIDS anymore?   32 
million people died of AIDS and people still die from it.   No one talks about 
it any more.  Covid will be the same way in 10 years.  That is my bet.

Again, lots of stuff to poke holes in here I am sure.   My only original point 
was that there are valid reasons folks chose not to get vaccinated.   We can’t 
and shouldn’t know what they are, but should respect their right to chose.



From: AF <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of 
Carl Peterson
Sent: Friday, July3, 2021 4:30 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

No vaccination is 100% effective.  From a public policy perspective, you need 
to pull on the levers that work in order to get R0 to be less than 1.  We know 
that a good percentage of people will follow a mask mandate.  Even if most of 
that group is vaccinated that lever will still do something since no vaccine is 
100% effective and some number of that population is walking around as 
symptom-free carriers at any given time.

Getting most people vaccinated would be the best way to lower R0, but if 
someone is too self centered to care about their neighbors or their country 
there isn't much you can do to make them care.  That lever isn't doing much 
these days.  The issue here really is about what is best for society vs what an 
individual thinks is best for themselves.  An individual's personal risk of 
having serious Covid complications is pretty low so if they believe there is 
some risk to the vaccine and don't account for externalities, e.g. them 
infecting other people, then it's hard to convince them to get vaccinated.

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 4:05 PM Dennis Burgess 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Why does someone who has made an informed choice not to get vaxxed by a NON-FDA 
approved drug have not sit out in timeout?  This is a free society, if you are 
so scared, you stay home. I will take my chances.


<image001.png>
Dennis Burgess

Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with 
www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com>
Need MikroTik Cloud Management: https://cloud.linktechs.net

From: AF <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of 
Jan-GAMs
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 3:32 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political


There is no having a sane discussion on this topic.  This is more like a 
whining child having an open temper-tantrum in public.  Un-vaxxed persons are a 
health hazard and attempting to explain this to a child is a bit difficult.  
Those who don't have a vaccine should not be allowed in public.  Every time a 
non-vaxxed person gets sick with Covid there is the potential for a new variant 
even worse than the Delta variant.  Un-vaxxed persons should be quarrantined as 
they are a health-hazard to everyone around them and to the public at large.
On 7/23/21 1:11 PM, David Coudron wrote:
I know, we can all make our own decisions.   However, I don’t believe I have 
stated anything that varies from the facts.   I can send you the Moderna sheet 
I received with my vaccine if you want to see that.

Your points about FDA approval are probably accurate, however, why is not OK to 
say that I want to wait for the approval?   That doesn’t seem so unreasonable.  
We don’t let folks on the plane based on the likelihood that those on the 
no-fly list probably won’t show up to get on the plane anyway.   We still check 
each and every person to make sure.  Just like we do the FDA approval process 
to make sure.   Otherwise, we could just tell drug companies “if you are pretty 
sure you’d pass anyway, we won’t bother putting you through the approval 
process”   We don’t do that for good reason.

I agree with you on the memes both ways.   Neither approach are helping the 
situation.   It should be a discussion based upon the scientific merits of the 
situation.   Unfortunately both side love to poke at the intelligence of those 
that don’t agree with their decision.

There is no way to know this for sure, but I wonder how many folks publicly 
shaming others for not taking the vaccine know that it is not FDA approved?

Likely won’t change lots of folks decisions, nor am I suggesting it should 
have.   But I don’t think that those of us that decided to go ahead with the 
vaccination get to make medical decisions for those who aren’t comfortable with 
an experimental vaccine.


From: AF mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 2:56 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political


I'm not calling anybody stupid, but I don't agree with most of your list.
On 7/23/2021 3:37 PM, David Coudron wrote:
Here is what I find particularly challenging about suggesting that folks who 
have chosen not to take the vaccine are not that smart.


  1.  Folks who do that never talk about that fact that this is not an FDA 
approved medicine/vaccine.   I took the Moderna vaccine, the paperwork clearly 
stated several facts.  Among them are:

     *   This is not FDA approved.
It has an emergency use authorization.  FDA approval takes a long time, but 
around 90% of the submissions end up approved because they are pretty well 
tested by the manufacturer before they apply.  Anybody applying for FDA 
approval already has a pretty good idea whether it's going to go through or 
not.  Presumably people on a no-fly list don't routinely show up at the airport 
expecting to board a plane.  Presumably people don't try to get a CDL if they 
know they'll fail the drug test.  Same idea.


     *
     *   This “vaccine” has not been proven to prevent the virus.   While we 
likely all agree that there is a very good likelihood that this “vaccine” will 
help prevent it, it is far from a proven fact.
99% of people dying of Covid right now are un-vaccinated.  We can split hairs 
and say maybe it didn't prevent them from becoming infected, but it clearly 
prevents them from dying.


     *

  1.  The argument is, “there should be no reason to think this vaccine isn’t 
safe since people aren’t dying from taking the vaccine”.
I've never heard such an argument.


  1.    Vaccines are a risk/reward type of medical treatment.   Every medicine 
you take has some level of side effect.   The vast majority of medicines have 
such negligible side effects, that they are considered completely safe.   The 
FDA approval process exists to ensure we understand the potential of serious 
side effects and drug interaction issues.   If you are 30 years old and folks 
are saying you have to take this experimental drug to prevent this incredibly 
small chance of you becoming seriously ill or dying, it seems like an 
intelligent thing to say “I am not sure the risk of getting seriously ill or 
dying from this disease outweighs the risk of using an experimental drug”.   It 
used to be that people relied upon a conversation with their doctor to 
determine personal risk of disease and use of a drug.    Apparently we no 
longer do that.   We publicly shame people into using experimental drugs.



  1.  Since it is not FDA approved, we don’t have a full understanding of drug 
interactions with other medicines folks need to take.
It isn't some weird new chemical we just invented this year.



  1.  We likely understand the very common medicines, but, certainly not all.   
We have FDA approval processes for good reason.   If for example, you were 
under 40 and were taking seizure control medication, it would be very fair to 
hold off on an experimental drug until it is fully understood if the vaccine 
might lessen the effectiveness of the seizure control medication.   An 
incredibly low risk of serious illness or death from the virus could turn into 
a good chance of serious injury from seizure.   As far as I know data like that 
is certainly not available yet.



  1.  Why do vaccinated people feel the need to belittle those that have 
decided not to get vaccinated by an experimental drug?

I don't know the answer to that.  I'm not comfortable with that behavior 
either.  It goes both ways though.  Plenty of memes out there accusing people 
of being dumb sheep for taking the vaccine.


--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--


--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



________________________________
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to