Seems to me like you're almost always going to be a lot better off just
using 80ghz (or even 60ghz, depending on requirements)... I guess if you
need more than 10Gbps it might make sense, but otherwise, it seems like
playing with this stuff is just going to cause a lot of unnecessary
headaches.

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:13 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I hope its come along way. we did some and it was awful. auto alignment
> had to be turned of because it would sometimes just start adjusting and go
> out of alignment like it was having a seizure. lens fogging was awful. We
> had one where it would take a courthouse down roughly the same time every
> day, finally tracked it to sun reflection off an aluminum parapet. i had to
> haul a truck tarp up onto the roof to cover the parapet to prove it. The
> only place for lasers is in flexible glass
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 9:16 AM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yep...they tried one from a bank building in El Paso to Juarez back in
>> the late 1990s...22 story building moved too much...we ended up installing
>> a 23Ghz link but from another location.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 6:24 AM Brian Webster <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would think now it would be easier to mount the laser in a gyro
>>> stabilized gimbal to account for the movement. In the 90’s that technology
>>> was not affordable. Image stabilizing cameras exist, gyro stabilized RC
>>> helicopters and drones are commonplace.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Brian Webster
>>>
>>> www.wirelessmapping.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
>>> via AF
>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2021 8:16 PM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>> *Cc:* Chuck McCown
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ***SPAM*** interesting...we installed several
>>> laser links in the 1990s...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I did too.  Mexico City.  E1 data rate.  High rise buildings.  Building
>>> movement was a problem.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 17, 2021, at 5:12 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> https://news.google.com/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vYXJzdGVjaG5pY2EuY29tL2dhZGdldHMvMjAyMS8wOS9hbHBoYWJldHMtbGFzZXItaW50ZXJuZXQtc3lzdGVtLWhhcy1zZW50LTcwMHRiLW9mLWRhdGEtd2l0aC05OS05LXVwdGltZS_SAXZodHRwczovL2Fyc3RlY2huaWNhLmNvbS9nYWRnZXRzLzIwMjEvMDkvYWxwaGFiZXRzLWxhc2VyLWludGVybmV0LXN5c3RlbS1oYXMtc2VudC03MDB0Yi1vZi1kYXRhLXdpdGgtOTktOS11cHRpbWUvP2FtcD0x?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to