The article mentioned that the town on the other side of the river was
using a 400km fiber line that goes around the river (I would imagine it
goes to a lot of other places too...), so yeah, I'd say it's connecting two
existing ISPs

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:17 PM Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:

> So 700TB over 20 Days, that's about 4gb/s average.  I wonder what these
> are feeding on each end, that that amount of traffic suddenly turned on, or
> if it's literally extending an ISP on each end.  Or is this just test
> traffic.
>
> On 9/20/2021 3:03 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> Yeah... other than potentially being capable of more bandwidth, and maybe
> getting around some regulations, I can't imagine what advantage there would
> be.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:41 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There's a whiz-bang-wow factor for free space optics.  I'm not sure if
>> there's any real technical advantage over millimeter wave though.  None
>> that I'm currently aware of.
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> On 9/20/2021 12:12 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>
>> Seems to me like you're almost always going to be a lot better off just
>> using 80ghz (or even 60ghz, depending on requirements)... I guess if you
>> need more than 10Gbps it might make sense, but otherwise, it seems like
>> playing with this stuff is just going to cause a lot of unnecessary
>> headaches.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:13 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I hope its come along way. we did some and it was awful. auto alignment
>>> had to be turned of because it would sometimes just start adjusting and go
>>> out of alignment like it was having a seizure. lens fogging was awful. We
>>> had one where it would take a courthouse down roughly the same time every
>>> day, finally tracked it to sun reflection off an aluminum parapet. i had to
>>> haul a truck tarp up onto the roof to cover the parapet to prove it. The
>>> only place for lasers is in flexible glass
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 9:16 AM Jaime Solorza <
>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep...they tried one from a bank building in El Paso to Juarez back in
>>>> the late 1990s...22 story building moved too much...we ended up installing
>>>> a 23Ghz link but from another location.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 6:24 AM Brian Webster <
>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would think now it would be easier to mount the laser in a gyro
>>>>> stabilized gimbal to account for the movement. In the 90’s that technology
>>>>> was not affordable. Image stabilizing cameras exist, gyro stabilized RC
>>>>> helicopters and drones are commonplace.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Brian Webster
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>www.wirelessmapping.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* AF [mailto: <[email protected]>[email protected]] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Chuck McCown via AF
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 17, 2021 8:16 PM
>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>> *Cc:* Chuck McCown
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ***SPAM*** interesting...we installed several
>>>>> laser links in the 1990s...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I did too.  Mexico City.  E1 data rate.  High rise buildings.
>>>>> Building movement was a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 17, 2021, at 5:12 PM, Jaime Solorza <
>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://news.google.com/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vYXJzdGVjaG5pY2EuY29tL2dhZGdldHMvMjAyMS8wOS9hbHBoYWJldHMtbGFzZXItaW50ZXJuZXQtc3lzdGVtLWhhcy1zZW50LTcwMHRiLW9mLWRhdGEtd2l0aC05OS05LXVwdGltZS_SAXZodHRwczovL2Fyc3RlY2huaWNhLmNvbS9nYWRnZXRzLzIwMjEvMDkvYWxwaGFiZXRzLWxhc2VyLWludGVybmV0LXN5c3RlbS1oYXMtc2VudC03MDB0Yi1vZi1kYXRhLXdpdGgtOTktOS11cHRpbWUvP2FtcD0x?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen>
>>>>> https://news.google.com/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vYXJzdGVjaG5pY2EuY29tL2dhZGdldHMvMjAyMS8wOS9hbHBoYWJldHMtbGFzZXItaW50ZXJuZXQtc3lzdGVtLWhhcy1zZW50LTcwMHRiLW9mLWRhdGEtd2l0aC05OS05LXVwdGltZS_SAXZodHRwczovL2Fyc3RlY2huaWNhLmNvbS9nYWRnZXRzLzIwMjEvMDkvYWxwaGFiZXRzLWxhc2VyLWludGVybmV0LXN5c3RlbS1oYXMtc2VudC03MDB0Yi1vZi1kYXRhLXdpdGgtOTktOS11cHRpbWUvP2FtcD0x?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to