The AC radios push a lot more data than M5 series but can't deal with noise as well...even with advance features. DFS is almost useless in our area and the non DFS frequencies are saturated
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022, 8:12 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. We have a few and I’m very happy with them. The GUI gives you very > intuitive feedback about available spectrum and airlink efficiency. > Cambium 450m will give you more capacity on a single sector --especially > with client radios distributed geographically to take better advantage of > MU-MIMO-- but LTU is easier and cheaper and simpler to deploy. If I was > deploying on a tower, and I had to get the most possible use out of the > more valuable 5.1 and 5.7ghz channels then I’d prefer 450m (assuming I > could afford it). If we’re looking at short range rooftop/microcell > situations where I could use fat DFS channels then I’d prefer LTU. If I > knew I’d only ever have a limited number of clients on the sector, that > would also be a strong case for LTU. > > > > There are some grognards who say Airmax AC is better than LTU, but I don’t > believe them. > > > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:13 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Ubiquiti LTU radios > > > > Hello my fine feathered friends,,,, > > has anyone tried these LTU radios yet? > > Thanks > > Jaime Solorza > > Wireless Systems Architect > > 915-861-1390 > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
