These are WISP clients of mine who are having issues...my SCADA links stay under the radar (pun) intended because I use 5 and 10MHz wide channels, use dishes at remote ends, try to keep every link at -60dBm, keep links as short as possible and perform a spectral analysis before and during deployment.. Most of these are rural water utilities away from airports and military bases... Too small to warrant expensive licensed radios like EPWU...they use 900MHz, 11 and 18GHz licensed radios and currently deploying a ton of 4.9GHz Cambium PTP links...funny, I recommended all this to EPWU when I worked at ESS back in 2007..
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022, 9:04 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > I don’t have an answer for noise except to use a different band. I mean I > have no answers that you don’t already know yourself: tighter beamwidth, > smaller channels, take a different path than the other guys do. > > > > Is CBRS an option for you? There’s a fee of a few dollars per month for > each unit in the SAS, but maybe you can pass that on to your customer. I > know munis don’t like recurring fees, but maybe get them to pay a lump sum > that covers 10 years of SAS fees up front? > > > > > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Monday, March 28, 2022 10:24 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti LTU radios > > > > The AC radios push a lot more data than M5 series but can't deal with > noise as well...even with advance features. > > DFS is almost useless in our area and the non DFS frequencies are > saturated > > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022, 8:12 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes. We have a few and I’m very happy with them. The GUI gives you very > intuitive feedback about available spectrum and airlink efficiency. > Cambium 450m will give you more capacity on a single sector --especially > with client radios distributed geographically to take better advantage of > MU-MIMO-- but LTU is easier and cheaper and simpler to deploy. If I was > deploying on a tower, and I had to get the most possible use out of the > more valuable 5.1 and 5.7ghz channels then I’d prefer 450m (assuming I > could afford it). If we’re looking at short range rooftop/microcell > situations where I could use fat DFS channels then I’d prefer LTU. If I > knew I’d only ever have a limited number of clients on the sector, that > would also be a strong case for LTU. > > > > There are some grognards who say Airmax AC is better than LTU, but I don’t > believe them. > > > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:13 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Ubiquiti LTU radios > > > > Hello my fine feathered friends,,,, > > has anyone tried these LTU radios yet? > > Thanks > > Jaime Solorza > > Wireless Systems Architect > > 915-861-1390 > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
