That also gives them the option to work for another 3 months for another
job.

It doesn't matter if they get paid over 9 months or 12 months - it's the
same amount per year.  If their salary is roughly 3/4 the average wage,
simply getting a summer job makes them average salary year round.

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 2:44 PM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

> My sister-in-law is a current high school teacher in Illinois. I can't say
> that I know her schedule intimately, but she does almost no (to no) work
> for June, July, and most of August.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]>
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 11:42:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT trolling this morning
>
>
>
>
>
> Do K-12 teachers still get the summer off? So 12 months pay for 9 months
> work?
>
>
>
> Who was the teacher in Calvin and Hobbes, something like Mrs. Wormwood?
> Teaching elementary school probably hasn’t changed much, except the kids
> are all on their phones now. Every class probably has a Calvin, and a Suzy,
> and a Moe.
>
>
>
> And the really crappy teaching job is probably the adjunct or associate
> professors or whatever they’re called, common at community colleges and
> whatnot. No tenure of course, and they will get assigned like 1 class so
> they have to teach at 3 different colleges to make enough money.
>
>
>
>
> From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steve Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 11:08 AM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT trolling this morning
>
>
>
>
> This is why school choice is so critical, you shouldnt have to move to get
> your kids into a quality school, your tax dollars should go with your
> student, not the district.
>
>
>
>
>
> Moneywise, small town superintendents shouldnt be making almost a half
> million a year, particularly when theyre outputting illiterate degenerates.
> Most superintendents salary would fund their districts basic school
> supplies for years
>
>
>
>
>
> Hopefully this new admin will eliminate all federal education related
> expenses with the exception of a federal military school for fuckwit kids
> like I was. If a student causes too much ruckus they can go to juvenile
> detention gladiator camps or military school. On that note, students moved
> to federal military programs will also no longer count toward the household
> welfare body count. If little johnny goes to camp, mammy doesnt get
> ebt/ssi/tax credit, etc for him. Theres no reason for taxpayers to pay
> twice.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:59 AM Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote:
>
>
>
> Shitty students and shitty parents are likely the #1 concern with
> teachers.
> I agree that teachers shouldn't have to pay for supplies out of their own
> pockets, but then why don't the unions ever get that stipulation into their
> contracts?
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Hohhof" < [email protected] >
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" < [email protected] >
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 3:49:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT trolling this morning
>
>
>
>
>
> Do parents monitor and help with homework? Go to parent teacher
> conferences? Check report cards? Or do they view school as government
> provided daycare?
>
>
>
> When I was a kid (yes, I know, hey boomer) the last thing you wanted was
> for the teacher or the principal to call your parents. And parents got
> roped into helping with school projects, and this was before the Internet
> so they bought us encyclopedias and took us to the library.
>
>
>
> And from what I hear, what teachers would ask for is smaller class sizes,
> and not to have to buy school supplies out of their own pockets.
>
>
>
>
> From: AF < [email protected] > On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 2:39 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group < [email protected] >
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT trolling this morning
>
>
>
>
> Do you think doubling their wage would make them suddenly good? Are you
> aware most teaching positions have very good benefits that arguably more
> than make up their salary? What they lost their benefits and just had a
> wage increase, would that make them all good teachers?
>
>
>
>
>
> Simplify paralleling wage to poor output isn't going to fix anything.
> Simply increasing wage doesn't fix anything. It's like printing out $300 to
> every single person and expecting it to solve all financial issues.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 3:35 PM Bill Prince < [email protected] > wrote:
>
>
>
> It's because we pay teachers crap.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 3/5/2025 9:27 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
> > There is a reason why there is such great support for dissolving the
> > education system as it is, we spend the most per pupil with one of the
> > lowest global outcomes. Its because instruction time is on the back
> > burner to all the noise. You think the little yellow guys in asia give
> > a shit about what extra flags they can hang? fuck no, their sole
> > education focus is superiority, and thats why theyre winning globally
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to