Im a firm believer that complexity requirements as they grow security vulnerabilities increase. When the bank auditors come in one of the first things they do is flip keyboards and open drawers looking for sticky notes. When you have to have a 16 digit password with all that complexity, its getting written down or emailed to yourself, or saved in a text file called passwords.txt, particularly in the age group with the keys to the financial castles right now. The password cracker calculators that say it would only take X amount of time to brute force that password make me laugh, because if a login attempt flag doesnt raise, its not a secure service thats being accessed anyway and a brute force toolset probably wouldnt be the tool used, so there really isnt a gain in end user password complexity, its more than likely a net loss in security
Doesnt matter anyway cause bill already has our passwords and account information. Im beginning to wonder if he isnt also behind extended warranties, i just dont know what his depravity limits are at this point On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 9:30 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > I sometimes use 8675309, I figure nobody under 60 will guess it. > > > > A WISP we bought out had ihtmanpn19 as the password on everything, for “I > have to make a new password now” and apparently they had done it 19 times. > > > > 20 years ago when WEP was still a thing, hardly anyone could come up with > a 10 digit hex password. You’d tell them it has to be exactly 10 > characters and you can only use 0-9 and A-F, and their brains would just > freeze up. So we’d tell them to use their 10 digit phone number as their > WiFi password. Some are still using that password, although the landline > phone is probably gone. > > > > I wonder what the meetings are like where they come up with password > complexity rules. Let’s make them use upper and lower case letters. > And no dictionary words. Oh, and numbers. That was fun, let’s require > special characters now, watch them struggle. How about you can’t repeat > the same character. Or use any of your last 10 passwords. Can we make > them eat a bug? > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2025 8:52 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: Gmail filters > > > > thats ingenious, hiding in plain sight > > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 4:27 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > > I always use 12345678! > > The bang at the always throws them off. > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 9/8/2025 2:15 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > based on your recent shady antics i think its you. Are you the Google > bill? do you have my passwords? is this what its all been about? > > > > dude, its Password1, its always been Password1 > > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:01 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > > Darn good question. Exactly who is/are the intermediaries? How many > hands(eyes) do your credentials pass through? > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 9/8/2025 10:59 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > This is why I hate all the sites that say “or log in with Google”. Like > paywalled content sites. What does that even mean, log in with Google? > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> <[email protected]> *On Behalf > Of *Bill Prince > *Sent:* Monday, September 8, 2025 12:10 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: Gmail filters > > > > The history did not show anything that looked even remotely suspicious, > and this account has no forwarding rules. There was one filter that I put > in so long ago, I don't remember when it was. This new filter just appeared > out of nowhere (at least to me). > > I use Thunderbird most of the time, and rarely use web mail. The one other > activity that I'd been doing in the time frame was archiving a bunch of > older emails to clear space, but I did that in Thunderbird. In fact, I > thought I'd accidentally created a filter in Thunderbird (that's what I > used to archive the old emails), but after I did the archiving, I purged > the Thunderbird filters). > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 9/8/2025 9:15 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > > you can look in your login history to see if your account was accessed > from elsewhere, also just for kicks check your forwarding rules to make > sure there isnt a forwarder set up > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 5:36 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just a few days ago, I changed all my google account passwords (in case > you hadn't heard, there was a breach of ~~ 2.5 billion accounts). > > As is probably the case with most of you, I have several google accounts > for different purposes (including this one). So I went through them one > by one. Just changed the passwords, and nothing else. > > Right after that, all my AF incoming started going directly to trash > (not spam). I couldn't for the life of me figure out why until I checked > filters, and somehow a filter had been applied that directed all > incoming to the inbox was sent to trash. > > I did not do that, and I don't know how it happened. My SO thinks I was > hacked, but I have a hard time believing that. > > None of my other google accounts was affected. > > > -- > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
