Maybe that's why Thunderchicken is working ok for me. I only have a
35GB archive.
bp
On 9/17/2014 6:55 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
Windows Live Mail. It was what replaced Outlook Express.
I like it for most things. But nothing is very good at gracefully
handling my 40 GB mail archive.
-----Original Message----- From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
What is WLM ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
Not sure what you mean by "displayed FROM field".
My email client (WLM) displays what's in the header, I would assume
that's typical. What else would it display?
I was responding to your statement that the From address wasn't the
sender on the old list either. It was.
-----Original Message----- From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
Yes, I agree that was in the header. I was referring to function
(displayed
FROM field and the replied TO field). Sorry if I wasn’t clear. That was
part of a longer conversation that explained the context
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
I looked at the headers of an email Bill sent via the old list and
here is
the From: header:
From: Bill Prince <[email protected]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
The From address wasn’t the sender on the old list either.
However, the old list said did say something like this...
[email protected]; on
behalf of; Bill Prince <[email protected]> in the
from.
Whereas the new list doesn’t show the
<[email protected]>.
For the moment, I believe that we will put that back in the body soon ...
like this... --- [ Bill Prince <[email protected]>
wrote ]
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 9:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
I think he means that the From address isn't actually the sender of the
e-mail.
----- Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul McCall via Af" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:53:09 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
Matt,
I looked at all the threads for the past few hours, and I see who it is
coming from each time.
However, it does not show their email address... we can add that back
into
the body of the message I believe. That is how we had it yesterday,
but the
upgrade "undid" that.
Thanks!
Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Matt Jenkins via Af
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
Unless you sign your name to the email, there isn't any way of seeing who
its from.
On 09/16/2014 03:15 PM, Ryan Ray via Af wrote:
Looks way better now. Thanks Paul
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]>
wrote:
*slow clap*
----- Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curtis Brotherton via Af" <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
To: [email protected] <javascript:;>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:34:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
I have also fixed the annoying 'Reply To' issue, where it was
replying to
the original poster AND the list.
It now only reply's to the list.
--
============================
Curtis Brotherton
PDMNet
(772) 564-6800
-----Original Message----- From: Jaime Solorza via Af <[email protected]
<javascript:;><mailto:
jaime%20solorza%20via%20af%20%[email protected] <javascript:;>%3e>>
Reply-to: <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
To: Animal Farm <[email protected] <javascript:;><mailto:
animal%20farm%20%[email protected] <javascript:;>%3e>>, Paul McCall <
[email protected]
<javascript:;><mailto:paul%20mccall%20%[email protected]
<javascript:;>%3e>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:09:24 +0000
Thanks
Jaime Solorza
On Sep 16, 2014 6:43 AM, "Paul McCall via Af" <[email protected]
<javascript:;>
<mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>>> wrote:
Guys,
We installed some updates in the middle of the night to fix the FROM
problem. There a couple tweaks that will be done today. My tech on the
project is now sleeping as we worked during the night.
PLEASE BE PATIENT.
Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800 office
772-473-0352 cell
www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com><http://www.pdmnet.com/>
[email protected] <javascript:;><mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>
<mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>>
