nobody wants a text based config file, its just a passing fad On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Bill Prince via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul, Paul, Paul, > > You know I have been asking for all of these for some time. IIRC, the > text-based config file might go back to circa 2006. > > bp > > > On 9/17/2014 4:37 PM, Paul Conlin via Af wrote: > >> If you really want to know this Bill, why didn't you ask for it earlier? >> Why spring this on Cambium all of a sudden? Do you expect them to read >> your >> mind?! >> >> PC >> Blaze Broadband >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> >> Behalf >> >>> Of Bill Prince via Af >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:32 PM >>> To: Motorola III >>> Subject: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium >>> >>> >>> Please let us know if: >>> >>> 1. The femtocell fix is in the pipe (or not) 2. There will be a trap >>> on >>> >> NAT table full, or >> >>> at least an OID that >>> shows the number of entries in the NAT table 3. As an alternative >>> to >>> >> #2, perhaps a >> >>> way to limit the number of MAC >>> addresses allowed behind an SM >>> 4. A text-based configuration file >>> 5. A "do this timing" that lets us just set an AP to match some other >>> AP as closely as possible by specifying the appropriate frame >>> dimensions (or maybe just the other APs IP address (now that would >>> be cool) >>> >>> TNX >>> >>> >>> -- >>> bp >>> >> >> > -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
