What radio needs 150w?


Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sunday, October 5, 2014 at 7:14 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas

This is actually in the category of what I'm expending a fair bit of R&D on 
right now.

The challenge comes cost.   150watt per port is very expensive to do when 
factoring in the DC-DC conversion.   20W is  easy.  50W is a bit harder.  150W 
gets very expensive quickly.

As a result, I'm thinking somewhat modular, i.e. pick/choose.

I also have to be mindful of the competitors in the space, in that I want to be 
different in the right ways.   The power injection/switching space is quite 
crowded.

-forrest

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Our infrastructure sites look like this:

Shielded Cables -> 8 or 24port shielded patch panel
-> APC PRM24 with WB Surge Modules
-> PoE Injectors
-> Switch / Router

PoE Injectors are attached to a Masterswitch.


<pipe dream>
I know this probably is not feasible but....
What I would REALLY like is an active PoE midspan injector (8/24 gigabit port). 
Something that does not require a site monitor (has web/snmp function built 
in). It takes AC power and can output DC to each type of device. This device 
would be software configurable for power type and has apc masterswitch 
functionality. It would need to support up to 150watt per port for WiMAX and 
Licensed Link Radios. It would need to support from 12vdc to 56vdc output. If 
there was a model that also supported power out to a few (4) AC outlets I 
wouldn't even need an APC Masterswitch. The goal is to replace all those PoE 
injectors which don't mount in a rack or on a din rail in a box.
</pipe dream>



Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
530.272.4000<tel:530.272.4000>


On 10/05/2014 01:19 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af wrote:
It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages out to the list.

With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is time for me to 
decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux.

We've got several products at various stages of completion, but almost all of 
them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of products we complete 
just because they help fill out our product offering instead of expecting a lot 
of revenue from them.   A couple of these have appeared on the website recently 
- I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the voltmeter/shunt input modules.

So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products PacketFlux could 
build which would help you in your WISP. I'm particularly looking for products 
which if they existed would go at every one of your tower sites, or even better 
at every customer location.  I know these product ideas exist out there, and 
I'd love to hear them.   Feel free to throw ideas out which are outside of the 
narrow niche that you think of PacketFlux fitting into.

One final note  - there is always a query for an all-in-one tower device which 
includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc conversion, battery 
charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power injection, fiber 
conversion, etc.. I've heard those loud and clear and am aware of that desire. 
There's work being done in-house toward something like that, but there are many 
hurdles left to make it a reality.  If there's a simplified version of this 
which would fit a specific, widespread, need I'd love to hear about it, but the 
idea of a device you put into your rack and it handles everything needed at a 
tower site is still quite a ways off for us.

So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a couple and run with 
them.

-forrest






Reply via email to