Wait For it ...

On 10/10/2014 08:01 AM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote:


The guy who got fired was on CNN this morning with his attorney. Comcast called Price-Waterhouse and told them they wanted to open an ethics investigation in that he went over the line. They didn�t mention how the investigation went but they fired him. Then Comcast issues an apology that they never wanted him fired. I�m smelling a really big lawsuit here.

Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David via Af
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 8, 2014 1:28 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Comcast is getting really ticked about complaints

Im sure there is some conspiracy there with comcast.. I m pretty sure theyre one of the few cablecos lobbing against WISPS to take away our 5G
�
Just my 2 cents
LOL

On 10/08/2014 11:42 AM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) via Af wrote:

    It will be interesting to see how this goes, but it's unlikely
    that Conal is blameless. Ken's probably on the right track.�

    We've had customers act unreasonably. They use DirectWay now...

    On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Jason McKemie via Af <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    This is Comcast we're talking about here though. They do some
    pretty outrageous stuff on occasion.

    On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, Mark Radabaugh via Af <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Given that we have all had calls from customers that are complete
    asses I pretty much have to assume Conal really crossed a line to
    get that much of a reaction.

    Mark

    On 10/8/14, 9:35 AM, Adam Moffett via Af wrote:

        The original article states that nobody has access to
        recordings of the phone calls or the contents of the emails.�

        Maybe Conal was the jerk.� What would someone have to say
        before you called his employer and told them they employee was
        being bad?� Something serious I assume.� Maybe Conal made
        threats or something.

        The fact is we don't know, and slashdot rallies automatically
        against the cable company because they're the cable
        company.� Not that I love my cable company....but the bias
        is quite clear.

            Per the original article it doesn't sound like the guy was
            being a jerk at all.� Comcast was, in fact, the jerk.

            On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Chris Wright via Af
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            That�s pretty shady, but this part of the editorial
            really ticked me off,

            ���� �/Be careful next time when you exercise
            your first amendment rights�/

            /�/

            The first amendment protects the rights of the people to
            speak freely, but does not protect you from the
            consequences of being a jerk.

            �

            Chris Wright

            Velociter Wireless <http://www.velociter.net/>

            �

            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
            *Josh Reynolds via Af
            *Sent:* Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:17 PM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Comcast is getting really ticked
            about complaints

            �

            Yeah I saw that.

            PS - f@#$ /. beta ;)

            Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
            SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>

            On 10/07/2014 02:51 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote:

                http://beta.slashdot.org/story/208189

                �

                Rory P. Conaway

                4226 S. 37th Street

                Phoenix, Az. 85040

                602-426-0542 <tel:602-426-0542>

                [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net>

                �

            �




--
    Mark Radabaugh

    Amplex

    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>   419.837.5015 x 1021  
<tel:419.837.5015%20x%201021>


Reply via email to