I have a customer who keeps asking for more upload speed because it takes
too long to upload a bunch of files to his server at a datacenter. He
thinks this should not cost a lot because he is just "bursting",
unfortunately what he wants would require a dedicated link from the tower to
his house. He will upload around 100 files when he finishes a project and
it takes about 20 minutes, apparently that's a problem. What I see when he
is uploading is about 50% duty cycle, apparently a file uploads, then dead
time, then another file. So I'm thinking he first needs to improve how
efficiently he uses his Internet connection.
He says he is using drag and drop in Windows 7. I assume this means he is
using Remote Desktop and using drag and drop within the RDP session from his
local drive to a drive on the remote server.
Would I be right that RDP drag and drop is not an efficient way to transfer
lots of files? (I've never done that myself.) What would be the best way?
Personally, I would just use FTP, maybe create a tar archive first, but he
is using Windows. If he needs security, it seems there are choices like
SFTP, FTPS, SCP. If HIPAA level security is not required, vanilla FTP would
avoid the encryption overhead. I found an article on how to set the number
of concurrent connections in Filezilla to something like 10, would that keep
the link 100% utilized? My other FTP client is WS_FTP, I don't know if it
can do concurrent file transfers.
- [AFMUG] customer needs to upload lots o... Ken Hohhof via Af
-