cron job and rsync. On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:13 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have started to do a LOT of this. My new hobby is a radio station which > we launched back in April. I am always recording and editing files and > sending them back and forth and i've found RDP is the best way to do this > since both local and remote are running windows 7. It does work > effectively and honestly, i don't think it's any different than FTP. > > I am on a cable connection at home and the radio station is colocated at > our Cyber office, so it's on our fiber there. FYI. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Sunday, October 12, 2014 3:17 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] customer needs to upload lots of files ... best > way? > > He needs a multi-threaded FTP client. > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > On 10/12/2014 08:05 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote: > > I have a customer who keeps asking for more upload speed because it takes > too long to upload a bunch of files to his server at a datacenter.� He > thinks this should not cost a lot because he is just "bursting", > unfortunately what he wants would require a dedicated link from the tower > to his house.� He will upload around 100 files when he finishes a project > and it takes about 20 minutes, apparently that's a problem.� What I see > when he is uploading is about 50% duty cycle, apparently a file uploads, > then dead time, then another file.� So I'm thinking he first needs to > improve how efficiently he uses his Internet connection. > > He says he is using drag and drop in Windows 7.� I assume this means he > is using Remote Desktop and using drag and drop within the RDP session from > his local drive to a drive on the remote server. > > Would I be right that RDP drag and drop is not an efficient way to > transfer lots of files?� (I've never done that myself.)� What would be > the best way? > > Personally, I would just use FTP, maybe create a tar archive first, but he > is using Windows.� If he needs security, it seems there are choices like > SFTP, FTPS, SCP.� If HIPAA level security is not required, vanilla FTP > would avoid the encryption overhead.� I found an article on how to set > the number of concurrent connections in Filezilla to something like 10, > would that keep the link 100% utilized?� My other FTP client is WS_FTP, I > don't know if it can do concurrent file transfers. > > >
